6 Point Recipe for Making New Parenthood as Difficult as Possible

4 Days old and the milk is in. Continuous skin to skin in bed with mother.

4 Days old and the milk is in. Continuous skin to skin in bed with mother.

1. Start with giving the birthing woman antibiotics in high doses so that the baby develops candida (thrush) and colic. Then mix in a lot of stitches, either to repair the perineum or the lower belly/uterus.

2. Separate the mother and newborn. Make the mother walk a long distance (with her stitched body) to be able to see/feed her newborn.

3. Teach her that the best (and only) way to feed her baby is to sit upright in a chair

4. Discourage sleeping together as a family. Don’t let her know that lying down to nurse will enable her (and her partner) to get much more sleep.

5. Tell her that the baby is not getting enough milk and don’t give her the tools to increase her supply.

6. Scare her into thinking that her instincts about caring for her baby are not to be trusted and that she should listen to professionals for all things to do with her baby’s health.

Vaccines and babies in NICU

Journal of the American Medical Association

JAMA Original Investigation | June 01, 2015
Adverse Events After Routine Immunization of Extremely Low-Birth-Weight Infants FREE ONLINE FIRST
Stephen D. DeMeo, DO1; Sudha R. Raman, PhD2; Christoph P. Hornik, MD, MPH1,2; Catherine C. Wilson, DNP, NNP-BC, FNP-BC3; Reese Clark, MD4; P. Brian Smith, MD, MPH, MHS1,2
[+] Author Affiliations
JAMA Pediatr. Published online June 01, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0418

Importance Immunization of extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is associated with adverse events, including fever and apnea or bradycardia, in the immediate postimmunization period. These adverse events present a diagnostic dilemma for physicians, leading to the potential for immunization delay and sepsis evaluations.

Objective To compare the incidence of sepsis evaluations, need for increased respiratory support, intubation, seizures, and death among immunized ELBW infants in the 3 days before and after immunization.

Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, we studied 13 926 ELBW infants born at 28 weeks’ gestation or less who were discharged from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2012, from 348 NICUs managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group.

Exposures At least one immunization between the ages of 53 and 110 days.

Main Outcomes and Measures Incidence of sepsis evaluations, need for increased respiratory support, intubation, seizures, and death.

Results Most of the 13 926 infants (91.2%) received 3 or more immunizations. The incidence of sepsis evaluations increased from 5.4 per 1000 patient-days in the preimmunization period to 19.3 per 1000 patient-days in the postimmunization period (adjusted rate ratio [ARR], 3.7; 95% CI, 3.2-4.4). The need for increased respiratory support increased from 6.6 per 1000 patient-days in the preimmunization period to 14.0 per 1000 patient-days in the postimmunization period (ARR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.9-2.5), and intubation increased from 2.0 per 1000 patient-days to 3.6 per 1000 patient-days (ARR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2). The postimmunization incidence of adverse events was similar across immunization types, including combination vaccines when compared with single-dose vaccines. Infants who were born at 23 to 24 weeks’ gestation had a higher risk of sepsis evaluation and intubation after immunization. A prior history of sepsis was associated with higher risk of sepsis evaluation after immunization.

Conclusions and Relevance
All ELBW infants in the NICU had an increased incidence of sepsis evaluations and increased respiratory support and intubation after routine immunization. Our findings provide no evidence to suggest that physicians should not use combination vaccines in ELBW infants. Further studies are needed to determine whether timing or spacing of immunization administrations confers risk for
the developing adverse events and whether a prior history of sepsis confers risk for an altered immune response in ELBW infants. http://archpedi.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=2300376&utm_source=silverchair+information+systems&utm_medium=email&utm_

Source: this blogpost http://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/

Q & A: Caring for my son’s intact penis

    Question from a mother:

Obviously our little guy is not getting circumcised (unless he decides he wants to when he’s older and can make that decision independently) but I was wondering how to go about cleaning him, moreso when he is a bit bigger, but like I have heard you are not supposed to pull the foreskin back, but surely at some point that will need to happen to clean in there right? I don’t want to hurt/harm him, but i want to make sure that area doesn’t get full of bacteria. What is your advice on this?

    Answer from Gloria:

Oh, so glad you asked, Karin. Right now, and until he is about 4 years old, his foreskin is actually attached to the glans just as the fingernails are attached to the nail beds. You only clean what is seen. Never retract the foreskin or you could damage that natural attachment and don’t let any medical professionals do it either.

When he’s about 4, he’ll reach into his pants and find that “toy” and then he will start playing with it. (They continue that till about age 80). That is the only way that the foreskin should come back—the boy doing it himself. Most boys/men simply retract their own foreskin in the shower and rinse with plain water and replace the foreskin. That is all the cleaning that is needed. It’s very easy.

This is a link to the brochure that I give out to mother’s of boys as a pdf. http://www.nocirc.org/publish/4pam.pdf Congratulations on your new little son. Love, Gloria


Additional comment, June 12,2015 Bodies are designed for pleasure. Only a big meanie would deprive anyone of having fun with their own body. Part of my education on boys having fun with their toy came from my brothers. When we were little, my mom would plunk all 5 of us kids (we were 18 months apart in age) in the bathtub. My brothers would do very impressive tricks with their toys,– popping out the shiny purple surprise from inside the foreskin. There was no need for my mom to clean anything, All that bathtub play took care of things. Gloria

Paul M. Fleiss, M.D., M.P.T.

In Loving Memory
Paul M. Fleiss, MD, MPT
Sept. 18, 1933 to July 19, 2014

Paul Fleiss 1933 - 2014

Paul Fleiss 1933 – 2014

Dr. Fleiss was a father of 6 children and a much-loved and respected Pediatrician for 50 years in the Los Angeles, CA area.
He spoke up for babies and was a voice of reason about the importance of breastfeeding, attachment parenting and keeping boys intact. He genuinely loved babies and wanted them to have the best health possible. In 1997, Dr. Fleiss wrote an article for Mothering Magazine called “The Case Against Circumcision”. Peggy O’Mara, the founder of the magazine adopted that title for the forum on her website on the subject of ending circumcision. Peggy would not permit any discussion that endorsed male genital cutting and the name of the forum was self-explanatory. To read Dr. Fleiss’ article go to this reprint. http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/fleiss.html

I met Dr. Fleiss when we both attended the International Symposium for Genital Integrity in Seattle, Washington; August 24–26, 2006. I was thrilled to meet him and be able to thank him for all his efforts to make life better and healthier for children.

Dr. Paul Fleiss, Gloria Lemay, Gillian Longley, Jenn Beaman and other intactivists in Seattle.

Dr. Paul Fleiss, Gloria Lemay, Gillian Longley, Jenn Beaman and other intactivists in Seattle.

Carla Hartley of Ancient Art Midwifery Institute brought us together again at a Trust Birth Conference in 2008 in California. I will remember him as a warm and happy man who made a big difference in the lives of those who were fortunate enough to read his books/articles, meet him professionally or use his services. He provided leadership to many physicians who have joined him in urging the abolition of male genital mutilation.

Jay Gordon, M.D. wrote about his memories of training with Paul Fleiss at http://drjaygordon.com/in-the-news/paul-fleiss-md-1933-2014.html

I offer deepest condolences to the family and close friends of Paul Fleiss. This fine man will be remembered with love and appreciation by doulas, midwives, lactation consultants, nurses and parents who will benefit from his work for a long time into the future. Gloria Lemay, Vancouver, BC Canada

Vitamin K

Routine procedures in neonatal care are questioned by parents and rightly so.  The first question is “does the benefit outweigh the risk?”  The next question is “is there really a problem?” and the third question is “Who is making a big money profit from this routine?”  Anytime we are giving a system-wide medication, there’s big money to be made.

A newborn baby has as much blood volume as can be contained in a soda pop can.  This is why the umbilical cord must be securely clamped after cutting because it wouldn’t take much to lose the whole blood supply.  It’s also a reason why many baby boys have died after circumcision–they can lose most of their blood volume into a diaper.  What are other ways that the baby can lose blood?  The most common is internal bleeding due to severe bruising.  When a baby is hauled out of the mother by forceps, vacuum extractor or through a cesarean (and, yes, many cesareans also involve forceps on the head or a vacuum extractor in addition to rough handling) the bruises on the baby can be so massive that  blood pools in those internal bruised areas and is not available for the function of vital organs. Giving the baby Vitamin K in order to boost the body’s ability to clot and stop that internal bleeding could be prudent.

What does this mean for the baby who is born without bruising and trauma?  It could mean that the baby is in even more danger of a medication error (giving the wrong drug, giving the drug in the wrong way, other human error) or sepsis from the skin protection being broken.  The preservatives in the Vitamin K could be causing harm as well.

gently born at home and kept intact

gently born at home and kept intact

Someone who has done some thinking and research about the Vitamin K subject is Michel Odent, a physician originally from France who now resides in Britain.

Michel Odent, M. D.

Question: What are the risks/benefits to letting your baby have a shot of vitamin K after birth?

Today there are many reasons to de-dramatize the topic and to reassure at the same time the parents who are inclined to refuse the shot and also those who prefer to do it.

To the parents who refuse the injection, we can say that they don’t take a great risk, since the chances of their breastfed baby having a hemorrhagic disease related to vitamin K deficiency is in the region of one in 15,000. It is even probable that the risks are still lower if the birth and the initiation of lactation were undisturbed. My view is that vitamin K deficiency of breastfed babies is probably no more physiological than the weight loss in newborn babies. After thousands of years of culturally controlled childbirth and lactation, we usually underestimate the amount of ‘colostral milk’, and therefore of vitamin K, a human baby has been programmed to consume during the first days following birth.

A well-constructed Japanese study showed that babies who consume 350 ml of breast milk in the first three days following birth are protected against vitamin K deficiency. Let us also remember that vitamin K deficiency is unheard of among formula fed babies.

Some parents who accepted the injection might feel guilty or anxious afterwards when hearing about two British studies suggesting that vitamin K injected at birth (not vitamin K given orally) is a risk factor for cancer in childhood. These parents must be reassured as well because the British findings have not been confirmed by other studies, particularly a huge authoritative Swedish study involving more than one million children. However one cannot hide the fact that the routine injection of 1 mg of vitamin K at birth is always associated with the injection of 10 mg propylene glycol and 5 mg phenol, the effects of which are unknown.

Source:  UPDATE ON DEC 30, 2013 The quoted material by Dr Odent was taken (by me) from a website called “Ways of Wise Woman” which has since been taken down. I’m happy that I was able to copy some of the information here before that happened. For more reading on the dangers of Vitamin K and links to the studies mentioned by Dr. Odent see this website http://legaljustice4john.com/jaundiceVitKshotNewborns.htm

UPDATE ON DEC 31, 2013. Dr. Odent has sent me this explanatory letter about the breastfeeding optimization which leads to Vitamin K natural coverage. Quote: “Since 1967 it is well accepted that breastfeeding is a ‘necessary factor’ in the pathogenesis of the hemorrhagic disease of the newborn (Sutherland JM, et al. Hemorrhagic disease of the newborn: Breastfeeding as a necessary factor in the pathogenesis. Am J Dis Child 1967; 113: 524-530).
My point of view is that that the vitamin K deficiency of breastfed babies is not more physiological than the weight loss of the newborn baby. In fact I wrote about the newborn weight loss in Mothering (Odent M. Newborn weight loss. Mothering. Winter 1989: 72-73). When a woman gave birth at home, in complete privacy, without feeling observed or guided (in conditions with make a ‘fetus ejection reflex’ possible), when the first contact between mother and baby in a very warm place has been undisturbed by distractions (such as somebody observing, guiding, talking or cutting the cord), and when mother and baby could maintain a quasi continuous day and night skin-to-skin contact during the first two days, one third of babies do not lose weight at all. In other words we usually underestimate the amount of colostral milk a human baby has been programmed to consume. All human cultural milieus routinely disturb the physiological processes. Most breastfed babies are not correctly breastfed.
These are important considerations when taking account a Japanese study which found that babies who consume 350 ml of breast milk during the first three days are protected against vitamin K deficiency (Motohara K, et al. Relationship of milk intake and vitamin K supplementation to vitamin K status in newborn. Pediatrics 1989; 84: 90-93). The Japanese researchers used a biological marker in order to detect vitamin K deficiencies without clinical expression. I summarized my point of view in the summer 1997 of the Primal Health Research newsletter (vol 5. no1).
In conclusion the vitamin K deficiency of breastfed babies might be an effect of culturally controlled childbirth and lactation. All societies have disturbed the physiological processes and particularly the first hour following birth via beliefs (e.g. the colostrum is harmful) or rituals. For that reason we have not known for a long time that the human baby is as if programmed to find the breast during the hour following birth. When I said that 25 years ago obstetricians and pediatricians could not believe me (Odent M. The early expression of the rooting reflex. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rome 1977. London: Academic Press 1977: 1117-19). Today we must readjust all our observations and interpretations by taking account the usual deviations from the physiological model.

Warmest regards
Michel Odent” end of quote

The reference for the large Japanese study mentioned by Dr. Odent is:
Motohara K, et al. Relationship of milk intake and vitamin K supplementation to vitamin K status in newborn. Pediatrics 1989; 84:

Added April 2015: Pharmaceutical information on Vitamin K with precautions http://www.rxmed.com/b.main/b2.pharmaceutical/b2.1.monographs/CPS-%20Monographs/CPS-%20%28General%20Monographs-%20V%29/VITAMIN%20K.html

Pediatric Response by Petrina Fadel

Part 1 : Dear AAP Board Members and AAP Task Force on Circumcision:

I am writing to you to request that you withdraw or rescind the newest
2012 AAP Circumcision Policy Statement. Below I have critiqued for you some of the serious problems with this new statement.

The Abstract states on page 585 that “health benefits are not great enough to recommend routine circumcision for all male newborns”, but this is not repeated even once in the long text on pages 758-785.
Other long columns favoring circumcision are repeated over and over again, on pages 761-762, 770, 775-776, and 778. The 1999 AAP Statement was 8 pages long (pages 686-693), but this diatribe against living with a foreskin goes on for 28 pages. There is almost the feeling that AAP physicians hope that if they repeat something over and over again, eventually it might become true.

The AAP concludes on page 778 that “the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks”, and yet on page 772 the AAP admits that “the true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown”. If one doesn’t know how often complications occur, then one can’t make the judgment that the benefits outweigh the risks! The AAP lacks the evidence it needs to make such a claim.

The 1999 Statement studied 40 years’ worth of research, and the 2012 studied only selective research since 1999. Only 1031 of 1388 studies were accepted to look at. Balance might have been found in the 357 studies that were omitted, but the AAP was not seeking balance. The AAP statement goes on ad nauseum about alleged “benefits”, to the point of fear-mongering that something will go wrong if an infant isn’t circumcised. It’s a high pressure sales pitch to try to get the American public to buy the circumcisions that AAP and ACOG doctors are selling. This is in direct contrast to Europe, where circumcision is uncommon and the health of European children equals or surpasses that of American children.

No studies on ethics were included in this statement, and it is clear that the rights of the child and how a grown man might feel about HIS foreskin being stripped from him were never given any consideration at all by the AAP. These are major issues, and even more important than many of the other minor issues the AAP discusses. Material was provided to the AAP to study this aspect of circumcision, but it was ignored. With one bioethicist on the panel, you would have thought that the AAP might at least have given the ethics of circumcision a cursory examination, considering that they were provided with many sources showing the emotional distress many men feel. Ethics and mental health, however, nowhere enter the picture for the AAP. Respect for the bodily integrity of another person were not included, and medical ethics were thrown out the window as infants were thrown under the bus.

Financing studies weren’t included in the studies, but the AAP did its best to push financing repeatedly for third-party reimbursement of non-therapeutic circumcision, at the expense of taxpayers during a time of budget crises. Those with private insurance would see premiums and medical costs rise. The cost for circumcision on page 777 ranges from
$216 to $601 per circumcision in the U.S. In 2010, the in-hospital U.S. circumcision rate was 54.7%. Thus, 45.3% of newborn males left
the hospital genitally intact. If the AAP were to convince parents of
these 45.3% to circumcise (as they are attempting to do in this 2012 statement), then there would be 45.3% of roughly 2.1 million baby boys that could be an additional income source for physicians. (Remember, don’t consider the ethics!) This would be an additional 951,300 male infants to profit from. At prices the AAP quotes, this could mean an additional $205,480,800 to $571,731,300 for doctors who circumcise.
This is no small sum, and as Thomas Wiswell, M.D. stated on June 22,
1987 in the Boston Globe, “I have some good friends who are obstetricians outside the military, and they look at a foreskin and almost see a $125 price tag on it. Each one is that much money. Heck, if you do 10 a week, that’s over $1,000 a week, and they don’t take
that much time. “(Lehman 1987) Money like that would certainly help
doctors make their mortgage payments and their car payments, pay for vacations, etc. – a “benefit” that the AAP failed to mention. Under Literature Search Overview, it is understandable why AAP physicians might consider it important to investigate “What are the trends in financing and payment for elective circumcision?”

No studies on the anatomy and functions of the foreskin were included.
This is surprising, since it would seem like common sense to consider what the functions of any healthy body part are before amputating it.
Probably since the male AAP Task Force members are all circumcised, this idea was difficult for them to grasp. Only one study on the sexual impact of circumcision was included, and this from Africa.
Other studies were ignored or discounted. “The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner”, which appeared in BJU INTERNATIONAL, Volume 83, Supplement 1, Pages 79-84, January 1, 1999, is not mentioned. Nor is the newest Danish study that was publicized on November 14, 2011 – “Male circumcision leads to a bad sex life” – “Circumcised men have more difficulties reaching orgasm, and their female partners experience more vaginal pains and an inferior sex life, a new study shows.” See:
http://sciencenordic.com/male-circumcision-leads-bad-sex-life The AAP had time to include this study, but it was ignored. Others sent material to the AAP about CIRCUMserum, Senslip, foreskin restoration that men are undergoing to undo some of the damages of circumcision and how this improves the sexual experience for both men and women. It didn’t fit the AAP’s pro-circumcision agenda, so it was ignored. The Policy Statement is totally lacking in ethics, anatomy, and foreskin functions. Instead, the Task Force is more concerned with how to train more doctors to circumcise, and how to do so with different devices and various forms of anesthesia.

The physical and sexual harms from circumcision are minimized or dismissed outright. Deaths from circumcision and botched circumcisions are considered “case studies”, and the children horribly damaged from circumcision don’t merit the AAP’s consideration, even though the AAP’s alleged mission is that it is “Dedicated to the Health of All Children”. When cribs are faulty or car seats aren’t safe, the AAP becomes concerned and warns the public. When physicians botch circumcisions and are at fault, children don’t matter. After one botched circumcision lawsuit and a large settlement, the company that manufactured the Mogen clamp went out of business. The AAP report should have advised physicians to NOT use the Mogen clamp because of the botched circumcisions that have resulted with this device. If still in use, no doubt there will be future tragedies with the Mogen clamp, but parents will only be able to sue the doctor and hospital and not the manufacturer.

There was so much reliance on studies from Africa in this statement, that it seemed like the AAP should change its name to the African Academy of Pediatrics. In contrast to the AAP, the American Association of Family Physicians (AAFP) has stated: “…the association between having a sexually transmitted disease (STD) – excluding human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and being circumcised are inconclusive…
most of the studies [of the effect of circumcision on HIV] …have been conducted in developing countries, particularly those in Africa.
Because of the challenges with maintaining good hygiene and access to condoms, these results are probably not generalizable to the U.S.
population”. But generalize the AAP did! In addition, the AAP listed page after page of STDs that allegedly circumcision would prevent, and wrote conflicting statements about syphilis. A recent study in Puerto Rico found that circumcised men have HIGHER rates of STDs and HIV. The 60% reduced risk of HIV following circumcision is the relative risk reduction, not the absolute risk reduction. There’s a huge difference.
Across all three female-to-male trials, of the 5,411 men subjected to male circumcision, 64 (1.18%) became HIV-positive. Among the 5,497 controls, 137 (2.49%) became HIV-positive”, so the absolute decrease in HIV infection was only 1.31%, which is not statistically significant.”
(Boyle GJ, Hill G. Sub-Saharan African randomised clinical trials into male circumcision and HIV transmission: Methodological, ethical and legal concerns. J Law Med 2011; 19:316-34.)

Infants are not at risk of STDs or HIV through sexual contact, so this speculation about their future risk is foolhardy. Infants can also be at risk for many other diseases, but surgical amputation of healthy body parts is a foolhardy approach for prevention and treatment of disease. If an infant is at risk of an STD, then it is probably safe to say that an adult is perpetrating a crime against the child and needs to be arrested and charged.

Judaism and Islam are mentioned as religions that practice religious circumcisions. Once again, the statement ignores Christianity, which teaches that circumcision is unnecessary. Christianity is the largest religion in the U.S., but its teachings don’t even get a mention by the AAP, which is rather insulting! With an over-representation of members on the Task Force who have a religious bias favoring circumcision, this is not surprising.

The AAP promotes parents choosing medically unnecessary circumcision for their male children, completely contradicting what it said in PEDIATRICS, Volume 95 Number 2, Pages 314-317, February 1995. It said then, “Thus “proxy consent” poses serious problems for pediatric health care providers. Such providers have legal and ethical duties to their child patients to render competent medical care based on what the patient needs, not what someone else expresses. . . the pediatrician’s responsibilities to his or her patient exist independent of parental desires or proxy consent.”

Parents deserve factual information about circumcision, but they won’t find it in the new AAP Statement. In fact, the AAP wrongly advises parents of intact baby boys to retract the foreskin and wash it with soap and water. (page 763) Soap can alter the good bacteria under the foreskin, potentially causing infections that should then be treated with liquid acidophilus to restore the good bacteria. Water is sufficient for cleansing. Circumcised doctors with circumcised sons probably don’t know this.

On page 764, the AAP speculates that the foreskin contains a high density of Langerhans cells, “which facilitates HIV infection of host cells.” Actually, the exact opposite is true. “Langerin is a natural barrier to HIV-1 transmission by Langerhans cells” (Nature Medicine- 4 March 2007). This study states, “Langerhans cells (LCs) specifically express Langerin . . . LCs reside in the epidermis of the skin and in most mucosal epithelia, such as the ectocervix, vagina and foreskin.”

UTIs can be prevented through breastfeeding, which the AAP allegedly supports. This is nowhere mentioned under “Male Circumcision and UTIs”
on page 767. HPV can be prevented with a vaccine for both boys and girls, but it is not mentioned on that same page. A recent study reporting on the large number of re-circumcisions done following infant
circumcisions is also not even mentioned. On page 770, EMLA is
mentioned as a possible anesthetic, but EMLA is not supposed to be used on infants. The fact remains that unnecessary surgery performed with anesthesia is still unnecessary surgery.

There is so much wrong with this new statement that it should immediately be withdrawn before it is presented on Monday. The AAP should either start all over again (with new, unbiased Task Force members), or renew its 1999 statement which attempted to at least give a more balanced view of circumcision. The 1999 circumcision statement certainly had its flaws by ignoring ethics and the anatomy and functions of the foreskin, but it wasn’t as atrocious as this new statement is.

If the AAP wants to be regarded as a credible organization, it will look to the judgment of other foreign medical associations who recognize that circumcision is medically unnecessary and has serious ethical problems underlying its practice. American parents should look to these foreign medical associations for good advice, since the AAP is not providing it in its new statement.

Petrina Fadel, Director
Catholics Against Circumcision

Part 2 : Sent to the AAP Board of Directors and the AAP Task Force Members on Aug 24, 2012 :

After rereading the AAP’s new Circumcision Statement, several more problems have emerged with this statement. This statement needs to be rescinded and withdrawn immediately! Others are becoming aware of this matter as well.

Under “Ethical Issues” (pages 758-759), two of the references for this opinion come from Dr. Douglas Diekema (AAP’s bioethicist), who signed his name to this statement. The rights of the child are totally ignored in this section, from an organization that claims to be concerned with the welfare of children but in this case isn’t. This is Diekema’s own personal opinion that the Task Force has bought into, based on what he wrote before. References are also taken from M.
Benatar and D. Benatar (both Jewish circumcision supporters), as well as from AR Fleishman (whom I suspect has a religious bias favoring circumcision). Under “Ethical Issues” (page 759), there’s an interesting choice of words by the AAP. “In cases, such as the decision to perform a circumcision in the newborn period, … and where the procedure is not essential to the child’s immediate well-being …” , the AAP admits here that circumcision “is not essential”. It even calls circumcision “elective” in several other places, but it then proceeds to do a massive sales pitch for this unnecessary surgery.

Under Ethics, Reference #14 comes from the British Medical Association- “The law and ethics of male circumcision: guidance for doctors: J. Med Ethics 2004. The BMA did not print a favorable piece on circumcision, but the AAP cherry-picked something from it on page 760. Medical associations in other countries, like the British Medical Association, do not promote circumcision as the AAP has so foolishly chosen to do.

On page 760, the AAP states, “The Task Force’s evidence review was supplemented by an independent, AAP-contracted physician and doctoral-level epidemiologist who was also part of the entire evidence review process.” Who was this? The AAP should reveal the name of this physician.

Several times in the report, the AAP states (page 762), “For parents to receive nonbiased information about male circumcision in time to inform their decisions…clinicians need to provide this information at least before conception, and/or early in the pregnancy, probably as a
curriculum item in childbirth classes.” There is absolutely no way
doctors can do this before conception, and “Inform their decisions” is code for brainwashing parents as early as possible. This is mind control at its worst, supported by the AAP!

The AAP on page 763 uses the term “Uncircumcised” under “Care of the Circumcised Versus Uncircumcised Penis”, and later the term “non-circumcised” when saying, “The non-circumcised penis should be washed with soap and water.” The correct terminology is intact penis, or normal or natural penis. We don’t say “uncircumcised” female or “non-circumcised” female.

The APP on page 764 states, “Mathematical modeling by the CDC shows that, taking an average efficacy of 60% from the African trials, [Note:
This is the relative risk, not absolute risk, which is 1.31%.) and assuming that protective effect of circumcision applies only to heterosexually acquired HIV” …” The AAP states here that they are assuming, which means to “suppose to be the case, without proof.”
There’s a saying that if you “assume” anything, it makes an ass out of u and me. Assumptions are not evidence, and since when should the AAP be relying upon or making assumptions? “Sexual Satisfaction and Sensitivity” (page 769) never once mentions or considers how circumcision impacts the sexual experience for females. The AAP gets it totally wrong about males, while then totally ignoring females! A Danish study by Morten Frisch (whom the AAP uses as a reference in
#118) revealed late last year that circumcised men have more difficulties reaching orgasm, and their female partners experience more vaginal pains and an inferior sex life.

“Analgesia and Anesthesia for a Circumcision After the Newborn Period”
(page 771) states, “Additional concerns associated with surgical circumcision in older infants include time lost by parents and patients from work and/or school.” The AAP is promoting newborn circumcision so parents don’t have to miss work? Parents miss work all the time when their kids get sick as toddlers or later on as young children. Now, all of a sudden, the AAP is concerned about parents missing work, but not concerned about the rights of the child.

Under “Complications and Adverse Events” (page 772), the AAP twice mentions how circumcision risks are lower in hospitals with trained personnel than those performed by untrained practitioners in developing countries. U.S. parents don’t live in a developing country, and this doesn’t even belong in an AAP statement!

“The true incidence of complications after newborn circumcision is unknown …” (page 772) “Two large US hospital-based studies with good evidence estimate the risk of significant acute circumcision complications … ” “(T)here are no adequate studies of late complications in boys undergoing circumcision in the post-newborn
period; this area requires more study.” (page 773) “There are not
adequate analytic studies of late complications in boys undergoing circumcision in the post-newborn period.” (page 774) Under “Stratification of Risks” the AAP says, “Based on the data reviewed, it is difficult, if not impossible, to adequately assess the total impact of complications, because the data are scant and inconsistent regarding the severity of complications.” After admitting that the true incidence of complications is unknown (i.e. the risks), the AAP then has the audacity to state that “the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks”. (page 756). Under “Task Force Recommendations” (page 775), the AAP says, “Physicians counseling families about elective male circumcision should assist parents by explaining, in a nonbiased manner, the potential benefits and risks …” The AAP doesn’t know the incidence of risks, so how do they expect physicians to know that?

The AAP sings its own praises under “Medical Versus Traditional Providers”. “Physicians in a hospital setting generally have fewer complications than traditional providers in the community setting.”
Was this the AAP saying that doctors are safer than mohels? I don’t think they’ll like that!

In 2009, ten years after the AAP did not recommend circumcision (and still doesn’t apparently, doesn’t on its words on page 585, but which one would never know after wading through this rubbish), their own survey of AAP members found that “18% responded recommending to all or most of their patients’ parents that circumcision be performed.” (page
776) I don’t find that surprising that AAP doctors would recommend a surgery that means more money for them. On pages 777-778 the AAP wants to know about the effectiveness of their new 2012 statement to mislead parents. “The Task Force recommends additional studies to better understand … The impact of the AAP Male Circumcision policy on newborn male circumcision practices in the United States and elsewhere.” In other words, how effective are we in deceiving American parents and people in other countries?

The AAP wants to work with the ACOG, AAFP, American Society of Anesthesiologists, and American College of Nurse Midwives to develop a plan about which groups are best suited to perform newborn male circumcisions. (page 777) In other words, how is the AAP going to divvy up the money it so eagerly wants?

The AAP targets blacks and Hispanics in the U.S. for unnecessary circumcisions. “African-American and Hispanic males in the United States are disproportionately affected by HIV and other STIs, and thus would derive the greatest benefit from circumcision.” (page 777) But then, under Areas for Future Research, the AAP says, “The Task Force recommends additional studies to better understand … The impact of male circumcision on transmission of HIV and other STDS in the United States because key studies to date have been performed in African populations with HIV burdens that are epidemiologically different from HIV in the United States.” The AAP just spent several pages before this promoting newborn circumcision to allegedly prevent STDs and HIV based on African studies, but now it’s admitting that more studies are needed because the results could be different in the U.S. Was this put in to help with the solicitation for more funding for pro-circumcision researchers at Johns Hopkins and elsewhere, to keep them going? Maybe these researchers are tired of Africa and want to come home?

The AAP did actually say ONE good thing, but only ONE good thing in this whole statement. On page 760 the AAP says, “The Task Force advises against the practice of mouth-to-penis contact during circumcision, which is part of some religious practices, because it poses serious infectious risk to the child.” If I were to guess, I’d say that perhaps Dr. Susan Blank put that in. While working for the New York City Health Department, Dr. Blank has done nothing to ban metzitah b’peh, so as not to offend the Orthodox Jews who practice it.
Babies have died of herpes from metzitzah b’peh under her watch.

This atrocious AAP Statement needs to be rescinded immediately. I suggest that the AAP use good judgment and do precisely that.

Petrina Fadel, Director
Catholics Against Circumcision

Male genital mutilation is ending

Circumcision: dirty little secrets exposed

    Circumcision Deaths and Botched Circumcisions – Circumcision Tragedies

Below is a list of known circumcision tragedies, from the earliest to the most recent. There are, no doubt, other circumcision tragedies that have never become public knowledge.

Commonly doctors pronounce infant circumcision a `simple operation
with few risks.´ However, the risks are many and can be devastating and
tragic . . . When viewed in terms of individuals and families involved
in these tragic events — particularly when the operation is
unnecessary — the risks are quite significant.
” [Rosemary Romberg,
author of the book CIRCUMCISION- THE PAINFUL DILEMMA, Bergin & Garvey
Publishers, Massachusetts, 1985.]

Courtesy of Petrina Fadel

– Known Circumcision Deaths, Botched
Circumcisions, and Unauthorized Circumcisions in the United States and Canada

Julius Katzenstein, 8 days old, bled to death after a ritual
circumcision performed by Dr. Abrams, December 14, 1856- New York, NY.


“The first known reported circumcision-related deaths were in New York City, where circumcision was introduced. The first was Julius Katzenstein in 1856 and the second was one-week-old Myer Jacob Levy in 1858. Both boys were circumcised by a Dr. Abrams, and the same coroner reviewed both deaths. The coroner found that Abrahams had performed the surgeries properly, and that the boys died from blood loss as a result of parental neglect. Neither boy had received a follow-up examination.” Dan Bollinger, from Lost Boys: An Estimate of U.S. Circumcision-Related Infant Deaths, available at: https://www.academia.edu/6394940/Lost_Boys_An_Estimate_of_U.S._Circumcision-Related_Infant_Deaths

Myer Jacob Levy, 8 days old, bled to death after a ritual circumcision
performed by Dr. Abrams, April 18, 1858- New York, NY.

April 23, 1858
(section: Police Intelligence)

Death from Circumcision

Coroner Hills held an inquest yesterday at the Sixth Ward Stationhouse, in the case of the child whose death from circumcision was announced in Thursday’s Times. The child, Myer Jacob Levy, (whose parents reside at No. 63 Baxter street,) being eight days old, was circumcised on Sunday
last by Dr. Abrams, of Bleecker street, who performed the operation in the usual manner. A few hours afterwards it was discovered that the bandage was displaced and that the child was bleeding profusely. Dr. Abrams was recalled, but his efforts to stop the hemorrhage were ineffectual. The verdict was; “Death from convulsions, superinduced by
loss of blood following circumcision; further we find that the
operation was rightly performed.”

(Online Archives of the New York Times)

Baby Boy Greisman died November 29, 1903 following a ritual
circumcision by Isaac Halpern. Bleeding was profuse, and Halpern applied carbolic acid, which caused acute disease of the kidneys.


1903 – Dec. 1
Toronto, December 1, 1903, p. 12.

Body will be exhumed for an inquest

Child of Louis Greisman died after circumcision-Jacob Halpern performed the operation.

AN INQUEST, which it is expected will have far-reaching results, will be opened to-night at police headquarters on the body of the infant son of Louis Greisman. The child died on Sunday night at 49 Chestnut Street and was buried yesterday in the Jewish Cemetery on Pape avenue. This morning Chief Coroner A. J. Johnson will apply to the Attorney General for an order permitting an undertaker to exhume the remains. Had the
remains not been buried the inquest would have been opened last night.
Chief Coroner Johnson will himself conduct the inquiry.

The report on the case made to the Chief Coroner by Dr. Walter McKeown states that Jacob Halpern, a butcher at 59 Chestnut Street, was called in by the father on Sunday to perform the Jewish rite of circumcision.
After the operation bleeding was so profuse that Halpern applied
carbolic acid, with the result that the child died in terrible agony.

Dr. McKeown, who was called in a short time before the infant’s death, refused the death certificate and referred the whole matter to Chief Coroner Johnson.

1903 – Dec. 2
Toronto, December 2, 1903, p. 12.

Isaac Halpern applied too much carbolic acid

Was ignorant of its use-claims to be a rabbi-had 23 years’ experience as a circumcisor.

THE DEATH of baby Greisman was investigated last night by Chief Coroner A. J. Johnson and a jury, who sat for over three hours. The body was viewed at Millard’s undertaking rooms, and, after Dr. McKeown had been examined, an adjournment was made to the Police Court. H. H. Dewart, K.C., represented the Crown.

Dr. Walter McKeown explained to the jury that he issued the burial certificate. Death was due to acute disease of the kidneys caused by the excessive use of carbolic acid. He was present at the birth of the child and at the circumcision. The day after the operation he was called in again to see the child and attended the infant until death occurred on Sunday night. Dr. McKeown thought that Isaac Halpern’s attempt to treat the child without a sufficient knowledge of antiseptics caused the death.

Rabbi Jacobs of the Holy Blossom Synagogue pointed out that under the Jewish law circumcision has to be performed the eighth day after birth.
He described at length the mode of operation which had been in
existence for 3,000 years. The Chief Rabbi of the British Empire twelve years ago formulated a set of rules for the guidance of circumcisors.
In Canada there is no special training. All that is required is that
the circumcisor be a conscientious Jew.

Isaac Halpern, who performed the circumcision, told the jury how he did the operation on baby Greisman. He had 23 years’ experience and never had a death before. Although he had no certificate to act, he believed that he was full qualified. He had performed three operations last week and had a like number for this week. Halpern declared that he was a
Rabbi. When there were very few Jews in Toronto he performed the marriage ceremony and other duties of a Rabbi. At the present time he kills all the cattle for his congregation to see if the meat is fit food.

Dr. John Caven, who conducted the autopsy, said that the condition found in the body was consistent with death from carbolic acid poisoning, the poison having been applied externally.

The jury’s verdict was as follows: “That the child came to his death from the excessive application of carbolic acid, and that Isaac Halpern was culpably ignorant of the use of carbolic acid.”

Baby Boy Rosenweig´s Death- April 1926

NY Times Archives
April 24, 1926

Deaths of Two Babies Laid to Brandy Given To Quiet Them in a Brooklyn Hospital

Suspicion that a mixture containing impure brandy resulted in the
deaths of two children in the Brooklyn Maternity Hospital, 298 South Second Street, Brooklyn, caused the Medical Examiner to have the bodies removed to the Kings County Morgue last night, where an autopsywill be performed today by Dr. Martin.

The children who died were a girl, born three days ago to Mrs. Ida Cooper of 276 South First Street, Brooklyn, and the eight-day-old son of Mrs. Abraham Block, to whom some of the mixture was also given,became ill yesterday afternoon and was taken home.

The Block baby was circumcised on Wednesday evening by Rabbi Gustav Spund of 322 East Third Street, Manhattan. The child was fretful andthe rabbi gave him a drink of brandy, water and sugar to quiet him.
Miss Lillian Reynolds, a nurse, asked the rabbi what the mixture
contained and he told her and explained why he had given it.
Miss Reynolds said that on Wednesday night when the Cooper and Rosenweig children became fretful she gave them a drink similar to
that given by the rabbi to the Block baby. All three children became ill on Thursday afternoon.

The Cooper girl developed convulsions and Dr. Medelowitz of 496
Bedford Avenue, Brooklyn, the family physician, was summoned for the girl and Dr. Blaustein of 371 Rodney Street, Brooklyn, was called forthe Rosenweig baby. Neither physician gave the babies any medicine.
Later in the night both babies died. Frank Dematto, superintendent of the hospital, on learning of the circumstances, notified the MedicalExaminers’ Office and an autopsy was ordered.

Rabbi Spund said last night that he got the brandy which he gave to the Block baby. He said the practice of giving such stimulant from the hospital’s supply was common.

April 25, 1926
Doubts Babies Died of Whisky Pacifier

Brooklyn Medical Examiner Finds No Traces of Disease–Analysis for Poison to Be Made.

Dr. M. E. Martin, Medical Examiner in Brooklyn, performed autopsies yesterday upon the bodies of two children who died on Thursday in the Brooklyn Maternity Hospital, and announced that he thought it
extremely unlikely that the babies had died from a mixture of whisky and water and sugar given to them at the hospital. However, chemical analysis will be made for traces of any poisonous element.

The children were a five-day-old daughter of Mrs. Nathan Cooper of 276 South First Street, and a son, eight days old, of Mrs. Max Rosenzweig [sic] of 170 Clymer Street, both of Brooklyn. Miss Lillian Reynolds, a nurse at the hospital, said she had given the mixture to the children as a pacifier, at the suggestion of Rabbi Gustav Spund of 322 East Third Street, Manhattan.

Dr. George Ruger of the District Attorney’s office was present at theautopsies performed in the morgue at King’s County Hospital. Dr. Martin found no traces of disease in the bodies. He did find, he said, that hypodermic injections, probably of adrenalin, had been given to both children, just over the heart, possibly to stimulate the heart action when death was imminent. The hospital kept no record of medication, he said.

May 1, 1926
[sic] Finds Paraldehyde Killed Two Infants

Deaths in Brooklyn Hospital Not Due to Brandy, Bellevue Toxicologist Says.

A paraldehyde sleeping potion and not brandy caused the death of an infant girl and an infant boy in the Brooklyn Maternity Hospital last Thursday, according to an announcement yesterday by Dr. Alexander O. Gettler, toxicologist at Bellevue, who made a chemical analysis of the infants’ organs.

The infants, a three-day-old girl born to Mrs. Ida Cooper of 276 South First Street and an eight-day-old boy, son of Mrs. Ellen Rosenzwei [sic], became ill at the same time that another child, the ten-day-old son of Mrs. Abraham Block, took sick. Rabbi Gustav Spund circumcised the Block baby and gave him a mixture of brandy, water, and sugar to quiet him. A nurse in the hospital administered a similar dose to the two other children when they became restless. The Block [baby]
recovered but the two other infants died the next day.

Dr. Gettler said the organs of both children contained a large amount of acetaldehyde, derived from paraldehyde. He did not believe the alcohol could have caused the deaths because only a small quantity of brandy had been administered and the infants had lived for twenty-four hours. The alcohol, he said, would work itself off in that time.

Dr. M. E. Martin, Medical Examiner of Brooklyn, submitted the finding to District Attorney Dodd, who said last night that he would not make any statement concerning the case until today.
08/21/1927 BALDWIN, Michael Julian 4 days Hemorrhage following circumcision; was circumcised on August 20 afternoon and died during the early morning of August 21.

Coroner’s Reports 1896 – 1935 Monroe County, Indiana

Roland Albert McCarty, infant boy, death by infection beginning in
circumcision wound, 1932, Jacksonville, FL

Personal Account by Van Lewis of Florida: Roland Albert McCarty was the baby brother of the Rev. Barnum McCarty, a retired Episcopal priest from Jacksonville, Florida, whom I have known since my childhood in the 1940´s and 1950´s. In the early 2000´s, Barnum told me the story of his brother’s death. Roland Albert died as a result of an infection that
started in his circumcision wound. Barnum said that his mother “never got over it.”


Bruce Wechsler was severely injured by a staph infection following infant circumcision in 1957. He has endured 14 operations and had half of his brain removed.

New hospice center to serve severely disabled

By Stacey Burling Inquirer (Philadelphia) Staff Writer

Elwyn, a Delaware County nonprofit that provides services for people with disabilities, is embarking on its first major new building in 19 years.

The building will have Bruce Wechsler’s name on it.

His parents, Alan and Laura Wechsler of Center City, see Bruce Wechsler Hall as a way for their son, who was severely disabled as a child by a staph infection, to be remembered. It will house 36 people who need intensive medical care when it opens next summer.

“Everybody makes their mark in life, and we wanted him to be able to make his mark in life,” said Laura Wechsler, who at 75 still works as a psychotherapist. “This hall is something that will carry his name and be important for a lot of people.” Alan Wechsler, now retired, owned Cherry Hill Photo.

The Wechslers gave the lead donation – $1 million – for the $11.5 million project, which will house people with physical and cognitive disabilities such as mental retardation and cerebral palsy who need significant nursing care. Many will be older, but some may be young people who are ailing or dying, said Sandy Cornelius, Elwyn’s president. Elwyn will provide hospice services.

Cornelius said the first residents would be people already living at
Elwyn, but the facility eventually could serve people from other
agencies. Advocates believe too many people with mental retardation are in nursing homes.

“There is no hospice program that’s really welcoming to this
population,” Cornelius said. The new hall “may end up becoming a
regional center for certain kinds of conditions.”

Cornelius said people with disabilities live much longer now than they used to and need a new kind of facility. The new building on Elwyn’s Media campus will have two 18-unit wings with wider-than-usual halls and doorways. There will be extensive space for family visitation, treatment, and dining.

When Bruce Wechsler arrived at Elwyn at age 8, there were bars on the windows.

Born healthy, he developed a staph infection after his circumcision. The infection spread through his blood to his brain. He had to have 14 operations, including one that removed half his brain.

His mother estimates that his brain operates at the level of a first grader, but he has far more sophisticated social skills. Alan Wechsler described his son as happy and outgoing.

When he was younger, Bruce Wechsler could run and play basketball. Now 52, he needs a wheelchair and is paralyzed in one arm but is not yet sick enough to move to the building that will bear his name.

“I think that he’s going to have to eventually move into that
facility,” his mother said.

Contact staff writer Stacey Burling at 215-854-4944 or
Walter Joseph Witkoski, Jr., was severely injured by infant
circumcision in 1965. His family received a $733,000 damage award on May 7, 1974 in Baltimore, Maryland. Walter would be 46 years old today.

May 8, 1974

$733,000 Damage Awarded Boy in Faulty Circumcision

Baltimore, May 7 (AP)– A Superior Court jury has awarded $$733,000 in damages to an 8-year-old Baltimore boy who was the victim of faulty circumcision in 1965.

The jury of eight men and four women deliberated less than one and a half hours yesterday before awarding the damages to Walter Joseph Witkowski Jr. The boy’s mother, Virginia Witkowski, was awarded an additional $1,300 damages for medical expenses.

The verdict was against the estate of Dr. Leon Greenwald, an
obstetrician and gynecologist who died in 1968.

(Online Archives of the New York Times)
Chino Burrell, 7 months old, died by circumcision on June 9, 1974 at the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada. He was circumcised for a tight foreskin, which is normal in infancy. If Chino were still alive, he´d be 37 years old today.


Kitchener Inquest

Baby´s heart stopped during circumcision
Special to The Globe and Mail

KITCHENER- Doctors at South Waterloo Memorial Hospital in Cambridge had to revive an infant on the operating table last spring after his heart stopped during a circumcision operation.

A coroner´s inquest was told yesterday that the 7-month-old boy´s heart was restarted by external massage and breathing induced by aerating his lungs. But Chino Burrell, son of Mr. and Mrs. Reginald Burrell of Cambridge, died three days later in the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto.

There was no testimony on the first day about the cause of death. The inquest continues this morning.

The baby was taken to the Cambridge hospital June 6 for circumcision, which was recommended by the family doctor, Dr. Lea M. Amog. She said the foreskin was tight enough to warrant the operation, described by the hospital´s chief of surgery, Dr. James E. De Roche, as a “minor operation” usually incurring little risk.

Dr. De Roche said that after he applied the clamp that draws the
foreskin into position for surgery he was advised by anesthetist Dr. Ross Howson that the patient´s heart had stopped. The child had been under anesthetic about 15 minutes.

Specialists in the hospital were called while Dr. De Roche massaged the boy´s heart area and Dr. Howson forced oxygen into his lungs.

Dr. John Wa, a baby specialist, testified that he opened a vein on the infant´s wrist, to inject an alkalyne solution to balance acididic condition that results from a shortage of oxygen in the blood.

Dr. De Roche told Coroner J. M. Campbell of Kitchener and the jury that he finished the operation, “though the lungs didn´t take over with a good deep breath.”

Dr. Howson used the anesthetic fluothane, a variety of halothane.

Dr. De Roche said outside the inquest that the chief coroner´s office has been discouraging the use of the drug since it might affect the liver when used over a prolonged period.

The baby was given an injection of atrophine about an hour before the operation started. Dr. Howson said the drug is used to reduce saliva secretions but has a side effect of speeding up the heart.

Another drug also was used, Anectine, a muscle relaxant that allows the insertion of oxygen tubes down the infant´s throat without causing the usual automatic gag spasms over the vocal chords.

But he said this drug has the side effect of slowing down the heart, occasionally “to the point of arrest.”


This boy was “sex-changed” to a girl after his botched circumcision in 1973. $850,000 in damages was awarded in late October or early November 1975 in Seattle, Washington. “She” would be 38 years old today.

November 2, 1975
Family Is Awarded $850,000 for Circumcision Accident

Seattle, Nov. 1 (UPI)- The family of a 3-year-old girl who was born a boy has been awarded $850,000 for medical malpractice during a circumcision.

The military doctor performing the operation when the baby was five months old burned the central area so badly during the circumcision, normally a routine operation, that specialists eventually advised changing the child’s sex to female, testimony in the two-day trial this week before Judge Walter McGovern of Federal District Court revealed.

Judge McGovern, noting that the child had undergone eight operations to date and faced several more as she matured, expressed concern for the child and her parents in awarding damages.

The child received $750,000 of the judgment and the parents $100,000.
Compensation also was ordered by Judge McGovern for the child’s medical bills, which exceed $30,000.

(Online Archives of the New York Times)


If Christopher Dolezal were alive today, he´d be 28 years old.


Saturday, November 20, 1982.

Grand jury to probe death of baby after circumcision

Register Staff Writer

A Polk County grand jury will decide if anyone is to blame for the
bleeding death of a Des Moines infant 10 days ago, a city police
official said Friday.

Lt. Ed Harlan said a police investigation into the death
three-month-old Christopher Dolezal, who died after excessive blood loss following a circumcision, showed that the child’s parents might have used “poor judgment.” But he said it would be up to grand jurors to decide if criminal charges should be filed.

Family members have declined to comment on the baby’s death.

The child was circumcised at the East Des Moines Family Health Care Center at 840 E. University Avenue on Nov. 8 two days before his death.

Despite heavy bleeding, the child’s parents Frank T. and Katherine Dolezal of 2535 Clarkson Ave., did not seek hospital treatment until about 1 a.m. Nov. 9. By that time the child had gone through more than 20 bloody diapers, according to the Polk County medical examiner’s office.

On Friday, a deputy medical examiner said an autopsy revealed that the infant had suffered four broken ribs and a broken right arm before death. Dr. Emmanuel Lacsina said some of the broken bones had healed.
Others were in various stages of healing, he said.

Lacsina said he doubted that the injuries occurred during the child’s premature birth. Family members said the baby was not circumcised shortly after birth, as is customary, because he was born prematurely.

Lacsina said he had hoped that microscopic examinations of the child’s liver would turn up a clue on why he bled extensively after what normally is a simple surgical procedure. Lacsina said individuals with liver problems sometimes have blood-clotting problems, too. But the tests revealed no abnormal condition or disease, Lacsina said.

The infant’s aunt, Norma Fitch, told reporters that the family
understood the child’s doctor to say there would be bleeding for about
45 hours.

But Dr. Harold Moessner, who supervises the clinic residency program, denied that any physician would have made such a statement. Moessner on Friday declined to comment further or to reveal the name of the
physician who performed the circumcision.

Jacob Sweet should be 25 years old today.


Wednesday March 8, 6:30 pm Eastern Time
Company Press Release
SOURCE: Johnson Flora

Betrayed by Doctors and Lawyers in Alaska, Sweets Find Justice Through Seattle Malpractice Attorney

SEATTLE, March 8 PRNewswire — Johnson Flora today issued the following statement:

When Jacob Sweet was born at Providence Hospital in Anchorage, Alaska in January 1986, it was a dream come true for his parents, Beverly and Gary. But their dream took a nightmarish turn only nine days later when they took their son back to the hospital for treatment of an infected circumcision and the hospital returned a severely brain-damaged and
blind child. The nightmare continued for 13 years and included“lost” medical records and an Alaska lawyer who claimed to be an experienced
medical malpractice attorney, but who had never tried a malpractice case. This is the story behind a major legal malpractice settlement
announced today between a Bothell, Wash., family and the Alaska law firm that handled the Sweet’s medical malpractice lawsuit against Providence Hospital of Anchorage and the pediatrician who treated Jacob for the infection.

The settlement ends a 13-year battle for the Sweets who were forced to fight for their son in the court system on two occasions. First, they sought justice from the hospital and doctor who allegedly caused Jacob’s injuries, and who then “lost” the medical records critical to
proving Jacob’s case. Then, after Alaska lawyer Alan Sherry mishandled the Sweets’ medical malpractice case, they were forced to once again resort to the courts to get justice for Jacob.

Seattle attorney Mark Johnson represented the Sweets in the legal malpractice suit, arguing the Sweet’s first attorney misrepresented himself as a seasoned malpractice lawyer and then failed to properly try the Sweets’ medical negligence case. The Sweets had hired Sherry to sue Providence Hospital of Anchorage for negligent care of Jacob during his hospital stay.

The amount awarded to the Sweets is confidential as part of the
settlement agreement.

“This has been tragedy at every turn for this family,” Johnson said.
“First the healthcare system devastated their child. Then, when the Sweets most needed an aggressive, experienced and competent lawyer, an attorney with no malpractice experience misled them and failed to properly try the case. That cost them their opportunity to recover damages from the hospital and the pediatrician,” he added.

The Underlying Medical Malpractice Case

The Sweet’s tragedy started on January 25, 1986, in Anchorage, Alaska, when they brought their nine-day-old son Jacob back to Providence Hospital after he exhibited signs of an infected circumcision. Jacob was admitted to the pediatric ward and displayed seizure activity for 24 hours, but their pediatrician, Dr. Daniel Tulip, was absent most of the time and failed to refer Jacob to a neonatologist until after Jacob
had suffered the brain damage that would leave him physically
devastated, developmentally delayed, and utterly dependent for the rest of his life.

Injustice Served Twice

The Sweet’s calamity compounded when the Alaska law firm they hired to try their medical malpractice suit improperly handled the case.
According to Johnson, the lawsuit hinged on the fact that Jacob’s medical records disappeared shortly after this tragic episode in the hospital, suggesting that someone was trying to cover up a negligent act. Sweet’s first legal team failed to present this evidence properly, although they had key witnesses prepared to present the opinion that the records must have been intentionally destroyed, claims Johnson. The Sweets lost the suit, and with it all hope of recovering damages from
the hospital that would cover the costs of lifelong care for Jacob’s severe injuries.

Racked with guilt and with mounting medical bills, the Sweets hired Mark Johnson to represent them in an action for legal negligence, because of his dual experience in medical and legal malpractice cases.

“To me the Sweets are heroic figures,” Johnson said. “In order to right a terrible wrong — the catastrophic injury to their son — they confronted two of society’s most powerful institutions: the medical system and the legal system. They fought for 13 years until they prevailed.”

Legal malpractice cases are difficult to prove, because the plaintiff must not only prove the defendant attorney was negligent, but that the client would have won the case if the attorney had acted differently, according to the International Association of Defense Counsel.

“This brings some peace-of-mind to our lives, although we are still convinced that Jacob’s doctor and the hospital have never told the truth,” said Beverly Sweet. “At least now we can provide for Jacob’s medical care and future.”

Mark Johnson is the co-owner of Johnson Flora, a legal and medical malpractice firm in Seattle. Johnson has significant experience in representing children and families who have been harmed as a result of preventable birth and neonatal injuries and is listed in the book “The Best Lawyers In America” for his work in legal malpractice law.

CONTACT: Rhenda Meiser of Firmani & Associates, 206-443-9357
206-443-9357 or 206-443-7546 206-443-7546 , for
Johnson Flora.

[For photographs of Jacob Sweet, see:

This boy should be 29 years old today.


Wednesday, May 28, 1986.


by Vincent Lupo
American Press Staff Writer

The family of a young boy, whose penis had to be amputated after it was severely burned during a routine circumcision performed at a state-run hospital, was awarded $2.75 million by a jury in 14th Judicial District Court.

Jurors made the award against the State of Louisiana Department of Health and Human Resources (DHHR) and the LSU Board of Supervisors. The family of the boy asked that they not be named.

According to testimony during the week-long civil trial before Judge L. E. Hawsey Jr., the boy who was 2 years old at the time, was to undergo a routine circumcision at W. O. Moss Regional Hospital on February 2, 1984.

A third-year surgical resident undergoing training through the LSU medical program supervised the operation in which an electrosurgical instrument manufactured by Valley Lab of Boulder, Colo., was used. The device, commonly used to stop bleeding during surgery, can cut tissue through heat transmitted by an electric current.

During the surgery which was actually performed by another resident under the supervision of the surgical resident, the boy´s penis was severely burned. Internal damage to blood vessels apparently also occurred and kept vital oxygen from reaching the tissue of the organ, which had to be removed later after the child was transferred to a New Orleans hospital.

Doctors in New Orleans strongly suggested that the parents allow them to perform a sex change operation on the toddler, but they refused. The boy´s urinary tract was rerouted during several subsequent surgeries both here and in New Orleans, and he now urinates through a hole located where his penis had been.

His parents sued the state and Valley Lab. Neither doctor was named as a defendant. The family claimed the manufacturer of the surgical device failed to adequately warn doctors of the harm which could be caused by the instrument.

The trial was bifurcated which means a portion was decided by Judge Hawsey and portion was decided by the jurors. Because juries are composed of citizens of the state, jurors are not allowed to decide any suit or part of a suit naming a state agency as defendant.

Therefore Judge Hawsey determined the liability of the state, while the jurors decided the liability of Valley Lab.

While jurors deliberated on their verdict, Judge Hawsey rendered his decision against the state. He found both DHHR and the LSU Board of Supervisors liable in the case.

The judge awarded a total of $18,969 in special damages to the boys parents for medical expenses and $100,000 in general damages, and $1.73 million to the victim.

In his oral ruling, Judge Hawsey said he felt Valley Labs was not
negligent in providing warnings about the surgical instrument.

Jurors, however disagreed and determined Valley Lab was 30 percent responsible for the injuries to the child.

The juries awarded the boy a total of $2.75 million.

Local attorney David A. Fraser, who represented the family, said the higher figure awarded by the jury is considered the amount of the judgement.

Since the state has a $500,000 limit stipulated by state law regarding its insurance coverage, Valley Lab apparently must assume the payment of the remainder. However, Valley Lab can attempt to recover 70 percent of that remainder since jurors found that defendant only 30 percent liable, Fraser said.

The attorney said he feels certain the defendants will appeal the
decisions to higher courts.

If Steven Christopher Chacon were alive today, he´d be 24 years old.


San Francisco Examiner, Friday, November 28, 1986: Page B-17.

Parents charged

An unwed couple whose garbage-strewn apartment allegedly caused the death of their 15-day-old son have been charged with felony child
endangerment and involuntary manslaughter, a Los Angeles prosecutor says. Lori Ann Needham, 20, and Christopher Tomas Chacon, 22, were charged Wednesday after the death of Steven Christopher Chacon, who died in his crib three days after being circumcised, Deputy District Attorney Kenneth Loveman said. He said the baby died from “exposure to filth,” which infected the unhealed circumcision. Chacon, an auto
mechanic, and Needham were originally booked for investigation of felony child endangerment and released on bail. But the additional involuntary manslaughter charge was filed Wednesday after further investigation, Loveman said.”

Antonio and “Baby Doe” (who underwent a sex change) were severely
injured by circumcision in 1985. They should be 26 years old today.


Tuesday, March 12, 1991.


By Charles Seabrook
Staff writer

Northside Hospital will pay $22.8 million to a boy severely injured in a circumcision accident at the hospital nearly six years ago, attorneys for the child said Monday.

However, Northside spokeswoman Karen Koch denied that a final
settlement had been reached and declined to comment further.

The child, who is not 5 years old, had his penis severely burned in a mishap in August 1985. His attorneys said he will never be able to function sexually as a normal male and will require extensive reconstructive surgery and psychological counseling as well as lifelong urological care and treatment by infectious disease specialists.

A second infant who underwent a circumcision at Northside on the same day also was severely injured. That child, known as “Baby Doe” underwent a sex-change operation shortly after the accident, and “consequently is now a female person, who has been rendered sterile and completely incapable of reproduction,” said a lawsuit filed in the child’s behalf. That lawsuit was settled for an undisclosed amount,
Northside officials said.

Thomas G. Sampson, attorney for the first child, named Antonio, said Northside has agreed to pay the child $22.8 million in several
installments over the next several years.

Mr. Sampson said he did not know why Northside has denied that the case has been settled.

“It’s settled, I can guarantee you that,” said Mr. Sampson, who added that the settlement was approved Friday in DeKalb County Probate Court.

The settlement is one of the largest even in a medical malpractice lawsuit in Georgia, he said. The parents of the child already had settled with the doctor who performed the circumcision, and Mr. Sampson said the total amount of money in the case is in excess of $23.8 million.

The circumcision occurred at the hospital on the day the boy was born. Mr. Sampson and fellow attorneys alleged violations of hospital protocol and the use of inappropriate equipment for the circumcision.

The hospital’s usual equipment for circumcision was out of service the day the infant was born, and doctors instead used an electrosurgical unit “that was contraindicated for use” in infant circumcisions, the lawsuit alleged.

Antonio already has undergone several operations, and a series of reconstructive operations, now under way, are expected to continue for at least nine years until he is 15 years old, his attorneys said.


October 8, 1985

Of the type of injury that occurred in Atlanta, Dr. George A. Kaplan, a pediatric urologist in San Diego, said, ”I am aware of about six or eight cases.” There does not appear to be any general reporting system for these injuries so there is no real way of knowing how many more cases, if any, have occurred.

Last year, a court in Georgia awarded $5 million to the family of an infant in Sylvester, Ga., who was similarly burned four years ago in a circumcision procedure involving an electrocautery device.

More recently, a 1976 article in The Journal of Pediatric Surgery
discussed the reconstruction of the penis of a 3-year-old child who suffered third-degree burns in a circumcision procedure using an electrocautery needle.

If Allen Ervin were alive today, he´d be 25 years old.


THE STATE, Columbia, South Carolina, Page F21, July 10, 1992.

The Associated Press

Spartanburg, South Carolina. A boy who was in a coma for more than six
years while a legal battle raged around him has died. But the legal
fighting will continue.

Allen A. Ervin was born in July 1985 and had been on life support since
December 1985, when his brain was damaged from oxygen deprivation
during circumcision.

He died at Spartanburg Regional Medical Center on Wednesday, three
weeks before his 7th birthday. Doctors said he suddenly suffered severe
heart problems, his mother, Stacey Stroble, said.

The Anesthesiologists who attended to Allen during the circumcision
settled the case for $435,000 and agreed to lifetime payment of his
medical bills.

Spartanburg County Probate Court officials are overseeing the estate.
Lawyer Charles Rice, who is in charge of investing the money, says a
judge will have to decide who gets it.

It angers Stroble, 21, who has two young daughters, that she may have
to hire another attorney to file a claim for her son’s estate.

“The money’s not my concern right now,” she said. “But I have to pay
for the funeral. I don’t think that’s right.”

Allen’s medical problems began when oxygen was pushed into his stomach,
instead of his lungs, court records showed. Anesthesiologists inserted
a tube into the baby’s stomach to relieve the pressure but administered
three times the recommended dosage of a drug to slow his abnormally
high heart rate, stopping it.

He was revived 30 minutes later but never regained consciousness,
although Stroble said Allen’s eyes and head often followed the voices
of people visiting him in his hospital room.

The legal problems began before that, however.

Stroble was 14 years old and unmarried when she gave birth to Allen. At
the request of her mother, Maggie Ervin, a Family Court judge in
October 1985 placed both mother and child in the custody of the South
Carolina Department of Social Services.

The custody disputes and guardianship fights went through seven state
and federal courts, including the state Supreme Court and the U.S. 4th
Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia.


If Demetrius Manker were alive today, he´d be 18 years old.



Miami, June 26, 1993

The Miami Herald reported the death of 6 month old Carol City baby,
Demetrius Manker. Manker bled to death after being circumcised.

“I can’t express the way it has affected me emotionally,” the child’s
mother, Louise Manker, said. “It’s something I’ll never get over. This
was my last child.” A Miami pediatrician circumcised 25-pound Demetrius
Manker in his office. After his mother took him home, she saw he was
bleeding from the incision.

Manker subsequently called the doctor several times, according to their
attorney, Patrick Cordero.

“One of the instructions was that she put Vaseline around the penis
area to stop the bleeding.” Cordero said, “she followed the
instructions to the letter.”

Louise Manker’s sister grew so alarmed by his continued bleeding that
she called paramedics, Cordero said. He was pronounced dead at the

An autopsy showed that his liver and other organs had gone pale from
the loss of blood, said Dade [County] Chief Medical Examiner Dr.
Charles Wetli.

“The message to get across is that this is weird, unusual,” Wetli said.
“I’ve done close to six thousand autopsies and this is the first I’ve
seen where a baby died from circumcision. It’s probably the safest
procedure you could think of.

An autopsy revealed a seemly normal circumcision, Wetli said.

The doctor who performed the surgery, Robert D. Young, said the
circumcision had gone well. “I would not have let him go home if I
didn’t think so. Medical examiners will confirm the soundness of the

Authorities say they will try to determine if the baby suffered from
some rare disease that prevented his blood from coagulating. It’s also
possible that Louise Manker did not understand the extent of the
bleeding, especially because a baby has a fraction of an adult’s blood
supply, Wetli said.

“There’s two parts to the story,” the deputy medical examiner said, Why
was the child bleeding? And secondly what was the level of
communication if the mother said he’s bleeding but didn’t say how much.


William Stowell is just one of many men who wish they could sue their
circumcisers for their “normal” circumcisions.

See: http://www.sueeasy.com/class_action_detail.php?case_id=258


MEN’S NEWS DAILY, April 29, 2003.

Doctor and Hospital Settle Circumcision Lawsuit

Stage Set for Men to Sue for Being Circumcised as Infants

SUFFOLK COUNTY, New York – After a two-and-a-half year legal battle
with Plaintiff William G. Stowell, the doctor and hospital have settled
the landmark circumcision case brought against them. The terms of the
settlements have not been publicly disclosed. Twenty-one-year old
Stowell filed suit December 19, 2000, in the U. S. District Court for
the Eastern District of New York, against the hospital where he was
circumcised and the physician who circumcised him as a newborn.

Stowell, born on December 22, 1981, in West Islip, NY, was circumcised
the following day by his mother’s obstetrician. This case presented the
issue of the legal validity of consent for circumcision obtained by a
nurse from a mother who was debilitated by the effects of a Caesarian
section and painkillers. It also questioned whether a physician could
legally and ethically remove healthy, normal tissue from a
non-consenting minor for non-therapeutic reasons.

David J. Llewellyn, one of Plaintiff Stowell’s attorneys, said,
“William and I are very happy that we were able to resolve this case
with both the hospital and the doctor. While a settlement is never an
admission of liability, I believe it shows that our allegations were
taken seriously. Never again can someone say that a young man who is
dissatisfied with his circumcision as an infant is being frivolous when
he objects to his mutilation and brings suit to obtain justice. This
case should send a message to doctors that they run the risk of a
lawsuit each time they circumcise an infant for non-therapeutic
reasons, particularly when they rely on the hospital to obtain consent
the day after birth. Social or cosmetic concerns provide no
justification for harmful surgery. I would expect that this is just
the first of many cases that will be brought by angry circumcised young
men against their circumcisers.”

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) first acknowledged that there
was no medical justification for routine circumcision in 1971. In 1999,
the AAP reaffirmed that it does not recommend routine circumcision.
The American Medical Association concurred in 2000, calling routine
circumcision “non-therapeutic.” No national or international medical
organization recommends routine circumcision.


Flesh and blood: perspectives on the problem of circumcision in
contemporary society- By Frederick Mansfield Hodges, Marilyn Fayre Milos

“Penile Torts in the Courts” – David Llewellyn, Chapter 6, pages 69 – 79.

“Since the presentation of this paper, the William Stowell case was
settled out of court and William Haynes became the second
eighteen-year-old male to file a lawsuit against the doctor and
hospital for having circumcised him.”

There is information about two unauthorized circumcision lawsuits from
1963 and 1967 under REFERENCES – 2.

This African-American boy should be 17 years old today.



Verdicts & Settlements

Circumcision Is Botched, Repair Never Recommended

$1.26 Million Settlement

On Sept. 3, 1994, two days after the birth of a healthy,
African-American baby boy, the defendant pediatrician visited the
child’s parents and offered to perform an elective circumcision. While
the mother was initially reluctant, she claimed that she was ultimately
persuaded by the defendant that circumcision was medically advisable.

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant never mentioned or noted any
pre-existing condition or anomaly that added any additional risk to the
circumcision procedure. The defendant reportedly assured the parents
that he had successfully performed numerous circumcisions in the past
without incident.

On Sept. 3, 1994, the defendant performed an elective neonatal
circumcision on the minor using a Mogen clamp.

During the procedure, the defendant inadvertently amputated a portion
of the minor’s glans penis. The defendant attempted to repair the
damage by closing a portion of the glans with three 5-0 chromic
sutures. As a result, the minor sustained a loss of tissue on his glans
penis, measuring 5 by 4 millimeters.

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant did not request or otherwise
recommend surgical repair by a pediatric surgeon, which, the
plaintiff’s expert was prepared to testify, would likely have improved
the cosmetic result and reduced the degree of resulting hypospadias.

Type of action: Medical Malpractice
Injuries alleged: Partial amputation of tip of glans penis
Name of case: Withheld
Court/case #: U.S. District Court (case no. withheld) Tried before
judge or jury: N/A (settled)
Name of judge: Michael A. Ponsor
Amount of settlement: $1.26 million structured settlement (present day
value of $550,000 cash) Date: Aug. 5, 2003
Attorneys: Eric J. Parker and Susan M. Bourque, Parker Scheer, Boston
(for the plaintiff)


If Jeremie Johnson were alive today, he would be 20 years old.


HOUSTON CHRONICLE, Friday, July 28, 1995, page 28A


Physician is suspended

by Lydia Sum and Ruth Sorelle

Saying they fear a “serious and immediate threat to public health,”
Texas Department of Health Officials sought permission Friday to
investigate the death of a 5-year-old boy after a circumcision.

Meanwhile, Doctor’s Hospital-Airline has suspended the anesthesiologist present during the July 18 circumcision, pending outcome of a peer review investigation and final autopsy of Jeremie Johnson.

The boy died Tuesday after a week in a coma and on life support.

Dr. T. Jose Tovar was suspended July 18, said Doctor’s Hospital
spokeswoman Jan Haines.

Family members said they brought the boy to the hospital that day for
the 30-minute procedure but he stopped breathing afterward and had to be resuscitated.

A secretary for Tovar said the physician declined comment. Haines
called the suspension routine in such instances.

Dr. Tovar has had many good years at this hospital,” she said. “He has
always been in good standing here and many know him in his field.”

In Austin, spokeman David Vaughn said TDH officials asked the federal
Health Care Finance Administration, which oversees Medicaid payments to find out why the boy died.

The heath department’s bureau of heath care quality and standards and the HCFA share responsibility to monitor patients’ treatment in Texas hospitals, Vaughn said.

He says he expects the investigation to begin early next week.

The boy’s mother, British Gaines, expressed frustration Friday at the
lack of explanation as to why he went into a coma.

Preliminary autopsy results only described the boy’s medical condition
when he was transferred to Texas Children’s on July 18, Gaines said.
Final results are not expected for another eight weeks.

“It’s very sad because I was thinking we’d actually find out something,
but there are just these big, medical terms that don’t tell us anything
we don’t already know,” said Gaines, 23.

In recent years, fewer boys have been circumcised because of
conflicting medical opinion as to its necessity. But in some cases,
medical conditions make it necessary.

Gaines said she thought the procedure on her son was successful until
Dr. Michael Morris, who performed the circumcision told her the boys
heart had stopped and he had resuscitated him.

Johnson was immediately transferred to Texas Children’s, where he was
in intensive care until his family decided to have him removed from a
respirator Tuesday.

Gaines said Morris visited her son at Texas Children’s to examine the
result of the circumcision. She said Tovar also visited them at Texas
Children’s on July 18.

He said he was sorry, that he didn’t know what happened, and patted me
on the back,” Gaines said.

Tovar graduated from medical school in Bogota, Colombia, according to
the Texas Board of Medical Examiners and has been licensed in the
United States since August 15, 1970. Board records show no disciplinary
actions against him.


by Lydia Lum and Ruth Sorelle Autopsy reports may be released today
explaining why a 5-year-old boy died this week after a circumcision.

Doctors at Texas Children’s Hospital removed Jeremie Johnson from a
respirator Tuesday, said Brenda Gaines, the boys great-aunt. He had
been in a coma for a week, she said.

Gaines said the ordeal began July 18, when she and his mother, British
Gaines took the boy to Doctor’s Hospital-Airline for a circumcision.
Brenda Gaines said they believed the 30-minute procedure went
successfully until a doctor told them the boy’s heart had stopped in
the operating room shortly after the operation.

The doctors resuscitated the boy and put him on a respirator, Gaines
said. He was taken by Life Flight helicopter to Texas Children’s she

She said the boy never woke up.

“At first we thought he was just sick because he just looked like he
was asleep. Brenda Gaines said. “But the doctors said he was cold as

Jeremie remained in intensive care for a week and his mother kept a
continuous vigil that resulted in her losing her waitress job, Gaines
said. Doctors at Texas Children’s hospital had given the boy a 50-50
chance of awakening, she said.

Doctor’s Hospital officials are investigating Jeremie’s death,
according to a statement issued by B. Lee Brown, the hospital

We offer our deepest condolences to the family of Jeremie Johnson,”
said B. Lee Brown. “We have begun an in-depth review of the case to
learn more about this tragedy. We hope to obtain additional information
from Texas Children’s Hospital to assist us in our investigation.”
Doctors Hospital refused further comment. Texas Children’s spokeswoman
knew little about the boy’s case.


This Russian boy should be 24 years old today.



Boy awarded $1.2 million in botched circumcision mutilation lawsuit

NEW YORK (AP) — A clinic has agreed to pay $1.2 million to an
8-year-old immigrant boy who was mutilated during a botched
circumcision five years ago, his lawyer said.

The settlement was reached a month after a civil trial began in state
Supreme Court on allegations the boy, then 3, lost part of his penis
during the operation, according to his attorney, Mark Pruzan.

The boy and his family, who asked that their names be withheld, are
Russian immigrants who were referred to the Brook Plaza Surgical
Ambulatory Center in Brooklyn by agencies that help new Jewish

The clinic’s attorney, Neil Ptashnik, was quoted in Wednesday’s Daily
News as saying that the settlement was “a business decision” that
carried “specifically no admission of guilt.”

The boy was one of 16 children who underwent circumcision at the
Brooklyn clinic in July 1990.

The clinic, a doctor and the rabbi who performed the operation were
being sued for causing “permanent shortening and disfigurement of the

During the trial, experts testified that the mutilation would make
sexual intercourse difficult when the boy reaches maturity, according
to Wednesday’s New York Post.

Under Jewish religious law, ritual circumcision – or bris – is
performed on 8-day-old boys. But the procedure was not commonly
available in the former Soviet Union. In addition, some Jewish families
refrained from having their sons circumcised because it could make them targets of prejudice in communities where Jews were victims of


Noah Benjamin Lapeyre
should be 14 years old today.


Press Journal (Florida) – January 29, 1998

Rabbi Gets Sued Over Circumcision

By Adam Chrzan
Press Journal Staff Writer

An Indian River County couple has sued a Palm Beach County temple and a rabbi for a botched religious circumcision that required emergency-room stitches and has left their son scarred.

Lisa Alsofrom and Maxou Jacques Lapeyre want an unspecified amount of money from Temple Emeth and Rabbi Abraham Cohen, who performed the circumcision on the couple’s son, Noah Benjamin Lapeyre, in June 1996.

A suit filed a week ago charges both the Delray Beach temple and Cohen, now a Connecticut resident, were negligent in performing what is known as a brith milah circumcision when Noah was 8 days old.

“He’s scarred for life physically and emotionally,” said David Carter,
the couple’s Vero Beach attorney. ‘`Everyone’s going to think of him as
the kid who was butchered by the mohel,” one approved to perform
circumcisions in the Jewish faith.

Alsofrom’s mother, a Palm Beach County resident, contacted the temple in late May 1996 and inquired about hiring a mohel to perform the religious ritual. The couple’s first son was circumcised in the
hospital, Carter said.

A receptionist at the temple gave Cohen’s name to Alsofrom’s mother.
The receptionist told her Cohen was affiliated with the temple, the
suit alleges.

Cohen, an ordained rabbi, had been hired by the temple as a religious
reader and was performing the circumcisions on his own according to
attorney Buck Vocelle, who represents the temple. “He did this on his
own,” Vocelle said Wednesday.

Cohen’s wife, reached at the couple’s West Hartford residence, said her husband could not be reached for comment.

Carter said his clients were given one of Cohen’s business cards, which
listed the temple, Cohen’s name and a notation about circumcisions.
“The business card clearly gives the message he was (working) for the
temple,” he added.

Cohen met with the couple but never informed them of the risks, the
suit alleges.

During the circumcision, which took place at the couple’s house, Cohen
reportedly “severed a portion of Noah’s penis and a blood vessel,” the
suit stated.

The infant was rushed to Indian River Memorial Hospital where he
received stitches and was transferred to Arnold Palmer Children’s
Hospital in Orlando, Carter said.

Noah, now 20 months old, has undergone numerous medical procedures including what is called a “revision” to the circumcision, and skin grafts to “improve the cosmetic appearance of the penis.” the suit said.

“Visually, it will always be different,” Carter said. “It’s hard to say
what kind of emotional effect this will have on him. It’s tough enough
going through puberty’ without a disfigurement.

The suit contends the temple and Cohen should have highlighted the
risks of the procedure should have used due care during the
circumcision and should have made known Cohen´s background, training and status with the temple.

Rabbi Jay R Davis of Temple Beth Shalom in Vero Beach said there is no
licensing agency for mohels.

“There is training, but no governing body,” he said.

Typically, parents contact a temple to recommend a mohel. The mohel
supposedly has studied with a doctor to learn the procedure, for which
he is paid several hundred dollars.

“Temples have nothing to do with mohels,” Davis said. Most mohels also carry no insurance, he said.

Neither Davis nor Temple Beth Shalom are involved in the lawsuit.

The couple’s suit seeks money for the pain, suffering and mental
anguish of Noah and his parents. The suit also seeks money to cover
current and future medical bills. Carter said the bills now total
several thousand dollars.

Noah’s parents declined to comment on the suit.

“These people are reluctant plaintiffs,” Carter said. Cohen agreed to
pay for the medical bills, which would have concluded the matter, but
he never followed through, he added.


If Dustin Evans were alive today, he´d be 12 years old.


IOWA LAW REVIEW, Volume 85, Number 4: Pages 1507-1568,
May 2000.

On October 16, 1998, three-week-old Dustin Evans, Jr. died in
Cleveland, Ohio during anesthetized surgery necessary to repair his
urethra, which had become blocked when his circumcision failed to heal.
The boy’s father is quoted as having said, “You think, ‘what could go
wrong with a circumcision?'” It appears that no physician fully
informed Dustin’s parents that serious complications can occur with
circumcision, and that such complications can lead to further surgical
procedures. However, the entire medical establishment, as well as
individual physicians and hospitals must share part of the blame for
needless tragedies that occur, such as that which befell Dustin Evans.
Circumcision, while being a widespread and long-standing surgery in
American medical practice, has never been the subject of a
comprehensive, prospective investigation into its complication rates.

This boy, who was circumcised without his parents´ consent and without
his consent, should be 13 years old today.


Doctor pays parents $23,000 for circumcision without consent.

Public reprimand to gynecologist who “never even apologized”

Dallas, Texas, June 30, 2000:

A suit was settled this week for $23,000, against a Dallas obstetrician
for wrongful circumcision. The victim´s parents, Charlie Hardy and
Randi Harlan say they also endured indignities from Texas medical and
government personnel during their nearly three year long legal battle.

The Texas Medical Board issued Dr. Roosevelt Taylor a public reprimand
– his second – on May 19, 2000 for “failure to practice medicine in an
acceptable manner.”

In September 1997, Hardy and Harlan advised Dr. Taylor that their other children were not circumcised because they felt that circumcision was barbaric and harmful to an infant. On September 26, 1997, when Mrs. Harlan was admitted to Tri-City Hospital in Dallas for delivery, she told the staff that there was to be no circumcision. To prevent an accidental circumcision, the attending nurse threw the circumcision consent form into a nearby trashcan.

Two days after their son´s birth, Hardy and Harlan were stunned when
their newborn son was brought to them from the hospital nursery crying and bleeding, and were horrified when they learned that he had just been circumcised by Dr. Taylor. “We were hysterical,” recalls Randi,
“But when Dr. Taylor stopped by the room his only comment was `It´s not the end of the world.´ I mean he´s never even apologized to us.” The couple believes Dr. Taylor circumcised their son intentionally in spite of their strong feelings against it.

“How could this have even been a mistake? There was only one other baby
with our son in the nursery at the time, we definitely did not sign a
consent form, and we specifically told Dr. Taylor that there was to be
no circumcision,” Charlie Hardy stresses. “We were totally betrayed by
our own doctor.”

Dr. Taylor´s lack of concern was replayed in the responses Hardy and
Harlan received from successive medical and government personnel as
they tried to find justice for their newborn child. An attempt to file
a police report was met with an amused reaction on behalf of the Dallas
police who then advised the couple that a wrongful surgery “was not a
criminal matter”. The Dallas County District Attorney´s office
explained to the couple that a public case was not “worth their time”.

The couple sought assistance from the state´s attorney general, the
federal attorney general´s office, and even the Texas Governer´s
office, but, according to the couple, “We were just laughed at, every
step of the way.”

The issue of Medicaid fraud also didn´t seem to concern state
officials. Hardy and Harlan contacted the Medicaid fraud hotline to
report Dr. Taylor for charging the surgery. “We were told that
performing this surgery without consent does not constitute fraud. We
can´t believe this doctor made money for performing a surgery we were
against, and then the taxpayers had to pay for it,” says Hardy.

Despite the out-of court settlement, Hardy and Harlan believe that
justice wasn´t served. “Dr. Taylor has done this twice now.” In 1991 he was publicly reprimanded by the Texas Medical Board for performing
surgery without consent. “He´s still out there practicing like what he
did was no problem. If the doctor had carved his initials in our son´s
stomach, he would not be allowed to practice medicine. But since he cut off our son´s foreskin against our wishes, people think it is funny and all the doctor gets is a slap on the wrist. I wonder how many other families this has happened to, but they gave up the fight after being laughed at and receiving no support?”

J. Steven Svoboda, Executive Director of Attorneys for the Rights of the Child, says events like this are neither rare nor isolated.


This boy, who was circumcised without his parents´ consent and without his consent, should be 13 years old today.


Patriot Ledger
January 05, 2001

$80,000 settlement to circumcised boy

The Patriot Ledger

Quincy Medical Center and an obstetrician have agreed to pay more than $80,000 to a boy who was circumcised and whose parents say the procedure was carried out against their wishes.

The parents told the hospital in August 1997 that they did not want
their son circumcised, according to a malpractice suit filed by the
parents. Nevertheless, Dr. Sandra Chenkin performed the procedure the day after he was born, court papers said.

Medical insurance experts said the case was unusual because it was
based on lack of consent rather than negligence, the usual grounds for
a malpractice claim.

Papers filed at Norfolk Superior Court contain the names of the parents
and child. The Patriot Ledger is not publishing the names to protect
the family´s privacy . . .

The case was settled Aug. 30, a little more than one month after the
parents sued. The parents and their lawyer agreed to keep the terms of the settlement secret, not disclosing where the case had been filed and who had been sued. The Patriot Ledger obtained the court papers
independently. The lawyer for the parents and child said he could not
comment because of the settlement agreement.

Under terms of the settlement, the parents received $14,418 in August
and their lawyer was paid $20,000. The child will collect four annual
payments of $20,588 starting on his 18th birthday, for a total of
$82,352, the agreement said.

The payments to parents, child and attorney total $116,770. However,
Chenkin´s insurer, which paid the settlement, laid out only $60,000 in
cash: the immediate payments to the parents and their lawyer, plus a
$25,352 annuity to cover the future payments, the court papers said.


Troy Gordon should be 17 years old today.


Santa Cruz Sentinel, Santa Cruz, California, USA,
Saturday, June 9, 2001

$1.4M awarded for botched circumcision
Associated Press

Sacramento– A Sacramento jury awarded $1.42 million to a 7 year-old
boy this week for a botched circumcision performed by a first-year
resident at University of California, Davis, Medical Center.

The verdict exceeds the legal cap of $250,000 on medical malpractice
awards because the hospital failed to obtain the parents’ permission to
operate. After the boy was injured, the hospital asked the parents to
sign a consent form, according to a press release by the parents’

The hospital did not immediately respond to calls by the Associated Press.

The boy suffered from a pituitary condition that made circumcision
difficult and dangerous, said Mark Blake, the parents’ attorney.

Blake said a first-year medical resident performed the surgery.


Date: 6/7/01 [7 June, 2001] Case Style: Gordon v. University of
California Case Number: 99 AS 05222 Judge: Unknown Court: Superior
Court, Sacramento County, California Plaintiff’s Attorney: Martin L.
Blake of Baum & Blake, San Francisco, California Defendant’s Attorney:
Ronald Lamb of Rust, Armenis, Schwartz, Lamb & Bill, Sacramento,

Description: Medical malpractice – Negligent performance of
circumcision on a newborn baby whose penis was injured. Troy Gordon was born, jaundiced and hypoglycemic on January 19, 1994, at the University of California at Davis. The circumcision was performed by a resident and the Plaintiffs claimed that an excessive amount of foreskin was removed in the procedure. As a result, the child has a “buried penis”.

The defense took the position that the condition created by the
surgical error would correct itself during puberty.

Outcome: Plaintiffs’ verdict for $1.4 million.


If Ryleigh McWillis were alive today, he´d be 10 years old.


THE PROVINCE, Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Friday, 13 February 2004.

Lack of post-surgery info angers grieving parents

With a baby son dead, they want care after circumcisions clarified

Suzanne Fournier
The Province
Friday, February 13, 2004

The tragic death of their infant son after a routine circumcision in
August 2002 still haunts a Vernon couple — who say they weren’t
properly informed about the signs of danger to watch out for in
post-operative care.

A coroner’s report released this week into the death of one-month-old
Ryleigh McWillis notes that the Penticton Regional Hospital where the
circumcision was done has significantly improved the information
pamphlet it gives out to all parents, and has changed both follow-up
care and documentation for all circumcisions.

But Tanna McWillis says she and her husband, Brent, a medical
professional who worked at the hospital at the time of his son’s death,
are disappointed that coroner Chico Newell made no other

“The coroner could have recommended that the hospital and doctor
clearly tell parents, ‘Any bleeding’s bad,’ and warn us what to look
for. I didn’t realize a baby can die from losing as little as one ounce
of blood,” McWillis said.

Brent McWillis, a lab technologist, transferred away from the Penticton
hospital after the death. The couple, who also have a five-year-old
daughter, relocated to Vernon.

“Brent still finds it too painful to talk about,” said his 34-year-old
wife. “The nurses were our friends and a couple of them who tried so
hard to save our baby felt so badly they quit.”

The Canadian Pediatric Society takes the position that male
circumcision exposes children to risk with no real medical benefits.

Circumcision is no longer covered by medicare in Canada and the numbers
of male babies circumcised have been rapidly dropping, down from a
decade ago when 60 to 90 per cent of all male babies born in North
America were routinely circumcised shortly after birth.

At B.C. Children’s Hospital, only 180 male babies were circumcised of
the 3,656 boys born in 2002-03 [or 4.9 percent], down from the 274
circumcisions done of 3,544 boys born the previous year [or 7.7
percent], said hospital spokeswoman Marisa Nichini.


If David Reimer were alive today, he´d be 45 years old. One has to
wonder about the boys from the 1973 Seattle lawsuit and the 1985
Atlanta lawsuit who both underwent “sex change” operations following
their botched circumcisions.


TORONTO STAR, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Tuesday, 11 May 2004.


David Reimer was the victim of an experiment gone totally awry – an
experiment that suggested nurture could trump nature.

The 38-year-old Winnipeg man, who was born a boy but raised as a girl after a botched circumcision, took his own life last week.

But for some, his death and his life will not be in vain.

Reimer’s tortured experience as a girl leaves a lasting legacy in the
field of gender identity and the debate over what shapes a human being: nature or nurture.

“David was a hero,” said Milton Diamond, a psychologist at the
University of Hawaii, at the John A. Burns School of Medicine in
Honolulu, who was involved in Reimer’s case.

“David didn’t give permission for what was done to him. Even though he didn’t have a penis, he still knew he was male,” Diamond said.

Thanks to Reimer, many psychiatrists and psychologists have had to
rethink their theories on what determines sex, says Ken Zucker,
psychologist-in-chief at Toronto’s Centre for Addiction and Mental
Health and a specialist in gender identity.

Reimer’s life story was described in a 2000 book by New York-based
writer John Colapinto, As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl. His story was also featured on Oprah.

In the early 1970s, one theory held that gender was flexible and a
child could be taught to be a man or a woman. “The (Reimer) case has
taught a lot of people in the field that things are a lot more complex
when it comes to gender than people originally thought 30 years ago,”
said Zucker.

“Where we’ve really had a lot of advances is in recognizing biology has
a predisposing influence on gender identity and gender roles.

“But the environment is also important.”

After a botched circumcision led to the removal of his penis, Reimer
was renamed Brenda and raised as a girl, later receiving female

His parents were following the advice of psychologist Dr. John Money of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.

Positive reports in medical journals suggested Reimer was adapting
successfully to his new gender as a girl.

Many, from feminists to learning theorists, embraced the case, using it
as an example that gender could indeed be taught.

But nothing was further from the truth in this case, said Dr. Keith
Sigmundson who was a supervising psychiatrist for Reimer from when he was 8 to 20 years old. Reimer didn’t adjust well to being a girl at all
and began having difficulties at school.

“By the time Reimer was 11, the whole experiment was falling apart,”
said Sigmundson, who was brought into the case by the Winnipeg school system. Reimer was eventually told when he was 13 that he had been born a boy. He rebelled and went back to being a boy.

“From that point on he sought out all the surgery,” said Sigmundson.

“He totally changed how he was presenting himself and struggled with a
number of operations. He eventually lived his life as a man.”

Reimer got a job in a meat-packing plant in Winnipeg. He married and
was a stepfather to three children.

Up until about a year ago, he was in “top form,” said Sigmundson who
remained in contact with him.

But Reimer felt responsible for the suicide of his twin brother two
years ago, the psychiatrist said.

Then he slumped into even more of a depression after losing his job and
separating from his wife.

His mother, Janet Reimer, told Canadian Press that she believes her son
would still be alive had it not been for the devastating gender study.
“I think he felt he had no options. It just kept building up and
building up.”

Many of the changes in the way social scientists, psychologists and
psychiatrists think about gender has happened because of Reimer and the
controversy surrounding his life.

“At the time, there was a major controversy in our society over whether
an individual’s personality and their adaptation of their gender was a
result of how they were born versus how they were raised,” explained
Sigmundson. The only one thing that is clear today is gender is a
combination of many factors, including biology and learning, he noted.

“There are certain immutable things that happen in your chromosomes and
in utero that develop the gonads that have an impact on your brain
which set the pattern for the rest of your life,” he said. “That’s
essentially what we know now.”

Sigmundson and Diamond were responsible for revealing publicly that
Money’s experiment had failed and all was not well with Reimer’s new
gender. They published a report in 1997 in the Archives of Pediatric
and Adolescent Medicine that outlined Reimer’s rejection of being a

“His life was very difficult,” said Diamond, crying as he spoke to a
reporter. “And I think the legacy is the whole issue of how people
identify and see themselves as male and female. It’s not as simplistic
as putting people into blue rooms and pink rooms. Certainly our
environment makes a difference and how we’re brought up makes a
difference. But we come to the game with our own inherent natures and
how those things interplay can’t be predicted.”


The surviving twin should be 6 years old today.


Rabbi probed for circumcised infants’ herpes

Baby died from disease after undergoing procedure

2/2/2005 11:50:15 AM ET

Ten days after Rabbi Yitzhok Fischer performed religious circumcisions
on twins last October, one died of herpes and the other tested positive
for the virus, according to a complaint filed by the health department
in Manhattan Supreme Court.

The complaint, reported in Wednesday´s edition of the New York Daily
News, also said health officials later found a third baby who had
contracted herpes after being circumcised by Fischer in late 2003.

Under Jewish law, a mohel – someone who performs circumcisions – draws
blood from the circumcision wound. Most mohels do it by hand with a
suction device, but Fischer uses a practice rare outside strict
Orthodox groups where he uses his mouth to draw blood after cutting the

Herpes can cause potentially severe complications for infants because
of their undeveloped immune systems . A recent study published in the
journal Pediatrics found that the rare ritual puts newborns at serious
risk of contracting herpes simplex virus and shouldn’t be performed as
part of the circumcision procedure.

Fischer´s lawyer, Mark Kurzmann, told the Daily News that Fischer was
cooperating with the investigation, although it´s unclear whether
Fischer submitted to the city´s request for a blood test.

“My client is known internationally as a caring, skilled, and
conscientious mohel,” Kurzmann said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report



Montreal, Friday, June 30, 2006.

BC man’s foreskin op a success

Government pays to repair botched circumcision

By Jennifer Laliberté

In late April Paul Tinari became the first man in Canadian history to have the government pay for surgery to reverse a botched circumcision.

Armed with letters from a urologist and psychiatrist, the Vancouver
engineer – who says he’s been in pain for years – convinced the BC
government to pick up 90% of the $12,000 tab. The final piece fell into
place when he located Toronto plastic surgeon Dr Robert H Stubbs, the
only doctor in Canada who’d ever performed a foreskin restoration.

“This is not something I went into lightly,” says 48-year-old Dr Tinari
of the complex, multistage procedure he began at the end of April. “I
assessed the risks [of the surgery] and was willing to take them. But I
certainly wasn’t willing to pay for it.”

The BC Ministry of Health says requests for funding for unlisted
medical procedures are approved only if the care isn’t available in the
province and if a medical professional has confirmed there’s a serious
medical or mental health issue. There were no existing rules to deal
with Dr Tinari’s unusual case. “Obviously, something like that would be
granted coverage only in rare or extenuating circumstances,” says
ministry spokesperson Sarah Plank. “We certainly don’t have a billing
code for it.”

“He got a big chunk because no one in BC does this and he had his
urologist and psychiatrist on his side,” observes Dr Stubbs, who
specializes in genital cosmetic surgery. “Some provinces are willing to
do things like that for their citizens.”


“Dr Tinari was a good candidate for the surgery,” says Dr Stubbs, who
says he doesn’t know of any other Canadian physicians doing foreskin
restoration. “He had sufficient donor skin and was well aware of what
he was getting into. I select my patients very, very carefully,” he
said. In fact, Dr Tinari is only the third patient he’s agreed to take
on. “This is like climbing Mount Everest,” he says. “It’s a huge

First, the skin is cut along the circumcision scar line and stretched
open to create a graft site. Then, two parallel incisions are made on
the scrotum – the donor site – leaving a sort of bridge with the two
ends attached on either side. “The penis is popped through the hole,
with the skin bridge covering the defect you created,” Dr Stubbs
explains. “Then we let that heal for at least three weeks.” In stage
two, the two ends of the bridge are cut, separating the penis and
scrotum. “You tuck those two pieces that are still dangling to the
underside and keep your fingers crossed that enough blood vessels have grown in to ensure survival of the graft.” Finally, when the swelling has subsided, the new skin is stretched over the penis with tape and traction weights to form a foreskin.


Dr Tinari sees this not just as a medical victory but a moral one too.
He alleges that his circumcision was forced on him when he was eight
years old by priests at his Montreal boarding school as punishment for
masturbating. He says the circumcision left him depressed, suicidal and
in chronic pain. He says his testicles would pull up onto the shaft of
the penis during an erection; a segment of the glans healed to a small
amount of remaining shaft skin, forming a skin bridge; stretching of
that bridge caused intense pain during erection, occasionally causing
tearing and bleeding during sex. He adds that cleaning under the skin
bridge was also very difficult, so he suffered from chronic infections
for years.

Nowadays, Dr Tinari, who has a PhD in engineering, is the director of
an environmental engineering company based in Coquitlam, BC. But he
spends a lot of his time campaigning against circumcision and for wider
access to foreskin restoration. “People thought that I would go away
after the surgery, but that was just the first step,” he says. “I did
this to restore my own bodily integrity, but also to set a legal

Given the complexity of the procedure, Dr Stubbs doesn’t expect to see a dramatic increase in patients. He’s staying out of Dr Tinari’s legal
pursuits. “I don’t ask women why they come in for a breast implant, and I didn’t ask him if he had an ulterior motive,” says the surgeon. “He
may have an agenda that I don’t know about, but this isn’t something
where the success or failure of his surgical procedure should make men
consider this an option or not.”

Meanwhile, Dr Tinari is still recovering; it’s nearly two months since
the surgery and his doctor is pleased with the outcome. “We seem to
have about an 80-90% graft survival,” says Dr Stubbs. “I transferred a
strip about 7cm wide, so he should have plenty for an adequate
foreskin.” The patient is also very pleased. “I’ve been working towards
this for thirty years,” says Dr Tinari. “I’m feeling better every day.”



THE NEW HAVEN REGISTER, New Haven, Connecticut, Thursday, 24 March 2005.

Oxford couple sues over circumcision mishap

STAMFORD – An Oxford couple on Wednesday sued a doctor who they say partially amputated their son´s penis during a circumcision at St.
Vincent´s Hospital in Bridgeport.

Immediately after his injury last June, the day-old boy was transferred
to Yale-New Haven Hospital where he underwent reconstructive surgery.

“We are bringing this case because we already know this baby has
suffered a horrible, life-altering physical injury, but we are still
learning about the longterm ramifications of the injury,” said Ernest
Teitell, one of the boy´s attorneys. “What happened will profoundly
affect him as he grows older.”

Circumcision, often performed for religious reasons, involves removing
foreskin from the penis.

The American Academy of Pediatrics says most complications from the
procedure, such as bleeding, are usually minor.

Robin Biondo, the boy´s mother, said Dr. Daniel S. Gottschall cut off
40 percent of the tip of her son´s penis.

“It was a very difficult thing to go through to see your newborn child
laying there and wondering how much pain he was in and how this is
going to affect him,” Biondo said.

In 2001, a jury in California awarded $1.42 million to a 7-year-old boy
for a botched circumcision.

In another case, the late David Reimer, a Canadian, was born as a boy but raised as a girl after a botched circumcision.

The lawsuit, filed in Bridgeport Superior Court, seeks unspecified
damages from Dr. Gottschall, who performed the surgery last June, and
his medical and surgical group, Alliance for Women´s Health.

Gottschall said he has performed more than 1,000 circumcisions without a problem.

“There was a slight tip that was removed, recognized and repaired,”
Gottschall said. “We believe there was a congenital deformity of the
penis that made the injury more likely. Because of my diligence, the
boy had the repair that was necessary.”

The boy, now nine months old, spent about 10 days in the hospital,
according to his mother.

See also: http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/10/07/30888.htm



MORGAN HILL TIMES, Morgan Hill, California, Tuesday, June 14, 2005.

Circumcision rates are down amid controversy

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Gilroy obstetrician Dr. Jumnah Thanapathy recalls seeing a botch, one
of the tiny percentage of procedures that go wrong, when she was still working at Kaiser Medical Center years ago.

During the elective circumcision of an infant, the doctor performing
the procedure accidentally cut too far down, slicing off the glans and
much of the head of the infant´s penis.

It was sewn back on like a re-attached finger, said Thanapathy, but the damage was done. Its extent would be impossible to calculate until the wound healed.

“We live in a society that looks at the statistics of a situation,”
said Thanapathy. “People see a 99 percent success rate, and they never think that they´ll be part of that one percent, but I just don´t see taking that risk for an elective procedure.”

Thanapathy is one voice in a growing number of physicians and parents questioning the practice of circumcision, a surgical procedure to remove the penis´ foreskin.


This boy should be 14 years old today.


MASSACHUSETTS LAWYERS WEEKLY, Boston, February 23, 2004.

Verdicts & Settlements

Excess Skin Removed During Infant’s Circumcision $110,000 Settlement

The minor plaintiff was born on Feb. 12, 1997. According to the medical
records, the defendant performed a circumcision on the minor plaintiff
five days after his birth. Following the procedure, the minor
plaintiff’s penis bled profusely requiring several sutures. His
hematocrit dropped from 45.9 to 34.1 after the circumcision.

After being discharged from the hospital, the minor plaintiff was
referred to a pediatric urologist who examined the minor plaintiff and
noted that his penis was virtually devoid of shaft skin. The urologist
noted that the condition of the minor plaintiff’s penis was highly
suggestive of excess penile shaft skin being removed at the time of

In October 1998, the minor plaintiff underwent reconstructive surgery
by the urologist. An additional reconstructive procedure reportedly was
necessary in order to attempt to rectify the damage done during the
circumcision. The case was resolved when the minor plaintiff was almost
7 years old; he did not sustain any loss of sensation or function. The
case resolved mainly on the minor plaintiff’s claims of pain and
suffering and the residual scarring caused as a result of the initial
procedure and the subsequent surgical procedures.

The defendant maintained that he was not negligent in performing the
circumcision. He further maintained that the minor plaintiff’s medical
condition predisposed him to excessive bleeding, that the clamp used
carried with it the risk of excess skin being removed and that the
subsequent surgery was unnecessary.

The case settled on the eve of the second trial date for $110,000.
Type of action: Medical Malpractice
Injuries alleged: Scarring
Name of case: Withheld
Court/case #: Withheld
Tried before judge or jury: N/A (settled)
Amount of settlement: $110,000
Date: September 2003
Attorneys: Gregg J. Pasquale (of counsel) and Melissa A. White (of
counsel), Keches & Mallen, Taunton (for the plaintiff)


This boy should be 3 years old today.



From the May 19, 2003 Massachusetts Lawyers Weekly.
Verdicts & Settlements

Tip Of Penis Amputated During Circumcision

Doctor Admits Mistake; Defense Later Questions Design Of Clamp Used

$725,000 Settlement

In June 1997, a baby boy was born to the plaintiffs. According to all
involved, the mother and minor plaintiff were healthy and in
satisfactory condition following the birth. The morning after the
birth, the minor plaintiff was taken from the mother to be circumcised.
The father did not accompany the minor plaintiff. Approximately one
hour later, the defendant doctor entered the plaintiff parents’ room
and notified them that a small section at the tip of the infant’s glans
penis had been inadvertently excised.

The defendant doctor further informed them that a surgeon was on the way to perform microsurgery to reattach the amputated section. The defendant doctor reportedly concluded by stating: “I wish I could blame the clamp, but I can’t. It was my fault.”

The operative note stemming from the reattachment stated that only a tiny section of glans penis had been amputated during the circumcision, that no damage had been done to the child’s urethra, and that full recovery was expected.

Over the next two years, the minor plaintiff had a remarkable healing
result. Follow-up appointments with different doctors, one of whom was
a noted specialist from Children’s Hospital in Boston, confirmed that
the minor plaintiff would not likely suffer any permanent injury as a
result of the circumcision mishap. There were, however, slight cosmetic deficits at the tip of the minor plaintiff’s penis, which were termed “skin tags.” These skin tags were removed by laser surgery and did not reappear.

The plaintiff’s expert agreed that there was only a slight cosmetic
deficit and that the urethra remained intact. He also agreed that the
child would not suffer any decreased sensation due to the original
insult. He added that he could not say for certain that the plaintiff
would grow to have full sensation at the tip of his penis.

As discovery progressed, the defense began to question the suitability
of the Mogen clamp used in the process. Despite the defendant doctor’s admission that the incident was his fault, the defense persisted with claims that the Mogen clamp had a design defect, which could allow for a portion of the glans penis to become trapped during the clamping process and inadvertently excised.

The plaintiffs did extensive research into the different implements
used for circumcision, and opined that the doctor failed to make
certain that only foreskin remained exposed after the clamp had been
applied. Ultimately, the case was settled with a structured settlement,
which will yield the child in excess of $750,000.

Type of action: Medical Malpractice
Injuries alleged: Section of glans penis amputated
Name of case: Withheld
Court/case #: Withheld
Tried before judge or jury: N/A (settled)
Special damages: $3,950
Amount of settlement: $725,000
Date: January 2003
Attorney: Darin M. Colucci, Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, Milton


This boy should be 14 or 15 years old today.


THE COLUMBIAN, Vancouver, Washington, Saturday, September 18, 2004.

Father pleads not guilty to assault in circumcision case

Saturday, September 18, 2004

By STEPHANIE RICE, Columbian staff writer

A Ridgefield man who allegedly performed a botched circumcision on his
8-year-old son pleaded not guilty Friday to second-degree assault of a

Superior Court Judge Diane Woolard accepted the not-guilty plea from
Edwin B. Baxter, who initially told Woolard he did not understand the
charge and then asked for a new court-appointed attorney.

After a brief discussion with his attorney, Tony Lowe, Baxter returned
to the bench and entered his plea.

His trial was set for Nov. 8.

Baxter is being held in the Clark County Jail on $50,000 bail.

Clark County senior deputy prosecutor Kim Farr said he has been unable to track down members of Baxter’s family, who have abandoned their rental home. Law enforcement and investigators from the state
Department of Children and Family Services also have been unsuccessful in finding the family.

Baxter, 33, and his pregnant wife have nine children. The state has
tried before to contact the family after receiving reports that none of
the children attends school.

Farr said he’ll seek a court order to take depositions from Baxter’s
wife, who was home at the time of the incident, and the victim. If the
defendant does not relay the word to his family that they are required
to give depositions, then Farr said he’ll consider asking for warrants
for the wife and son to be arrested and kept in custody as material
witnesses until the trial.

Baxter, a truck driver, was arrested Sept. 3 after he called 911 to
report that his son was bleeding profusely in the family´s bathroom.
Baxter allegedly said he tried to circumcise his son after reading
biblical passages about the procedure.

Farr said Baxter put a blanket and pillow in the bathtub to try and
make his son comfortable.

If convicted of second-degree assault, Baxter could face three years in prison.

Stephanie Rice covers the courts. She can be reached at 360-759-8004
360-759-8004 or stephanie.rice@columbian.com.

Hunter Dumire is at least 5 years old, and possibly older.


Preston couple sues WVU over son’s circumcision 4/18/2007 8:00 AM By Cara Bailey -Monongalia Bureau

MORGANTOWN – A Preston County couple has filed a medical malpractice suit against the West Virginia University Medical Corporation on behalf of their son.

Scott and Sherry Dumire filed a suit April 9 in Monongalia Circuit
Court, on behalf of Hunter Dumire. The suit names the West Virginia
University Board of Governors and West Virginia University Medical
Corporation — doing business as University Health Associates — as

According to the suit, Hunter Dumire was injured during a circumcision
procedure on Oct. 20, 2005, at the health center. The suit says the
deviation of care during the procedure caused injury and damages to the

As a result of the alleged negligence of the defendants, the Dumires
have incurred medical expenses, and will continue to incur the bills
for the care, treatment and hospitalization of Hunter Dumire.

They also claim Hunter has been permanently disfigured and request full
compensation for the injuries and damages sustained.

Attornies Wesley W. Metheney and Steven L. Shaffer are counsel for the

Monongalia Circuit Court case number 07-C-250


This boy should be 4 years old today.


EARTHTIMES, Wednesday, July 18, 2007

Circumcision Atrocity Suit Filed Against Coles County Hospital

MATTOON, Ill., July 18 /PRNewswire/ — The day after birth on February
15, 2007, an infant at Sarah Bush Hospital had a standard circumcision
procedure performed by Dr. Sherif Malek. However, what should have been
a forgotten memory for the boy became a lifelong nightmare. Due to
negligence, Dr. Malek severed the entire glans, commonly termed the
head, of the infant’s penis. Today, Jerry A. Latherow of Latherow Law
Office on behalf of plaintiffs Boy Doe (the infant) and his mother,
Jane Doe, filed a complaint for compensation for damages against Sarah Bush Lincoln Health System, Inc, 1000 Health Center Drive, Mattoon, IL, and Sherif Malek, D.O. in the Circuit Court of Coles County, Illinois.

The infant was a healthy seven pound newborn who was delivered without complications on February 14, 2007. The following day, a routine circumcision was performed on the infant by Dr. Malek using a Mogen clamp, a metal, hinge-shaped device used during the procedure. At the completion of the circumcision, hospital records indicated there was significant bleeding. Inspection of the penis revealed nearly all of the glans had been amputated at the time of the circumcision. Three months later, the infant required penile skin transfer surgery at the University of Illinois, with need for future procedures, some of which are only appropriate at the age of puberty.

According to medical expert witness, Dr. David Zbaraz with Northwestern Memorial Hospital in Chicago, who reviewed the Sarah Bush medical records of the infant, “The Mogen clamp when used properly cannot amputate a male infant’s glans. The injury to this boy was completely preventable.”

Across the United States major settlements have been made for botched
circumcisions. In 1991, a hospital in Atlanta, GA, agreed to pay $22.8
million because of negligence during a circumcision. Also in New York
City a boy received $1.2 million for a circumcision error, and in Lake
Charles, LA a family received $2.75 million after a boy’s penis was
burned during a routine circumcision.

“Through simple carelessness at Sarah Bush Hospital, a boy will face
physical disfigurement and psychological trauma throughout his life,”
said Jerry A. Latherow, the attorney representing Boy Doe and Jane Doe,
“Unfortunately, caps on medical malpractice cases in Illinois will
prevent the boy from recovering more than $500,000 against the
physician for the lifelong deformity and urological care, and any
associated psychological problems. Sadly, the hospital’s liability for
such damages is capped at $1 million. Even before the case is tried, a
mother and her child have been robbed.”

A complete copy of the complaint is available upon request. About Jerry
A. Latherow

Jerry A. Latherow is a veteran trial lawyer who has attained verdicts
and settlements for his clients in cases involving medical malpractice,
vehicular and construction liability, and airplane crash cases. In
2003, he was recognized by the National Law Journal as obtaining one of
the top 100 verdicts in the country.

CONTACTS: Jerry A. Latherow, attorney for plaintiffs: 312-372-0052
312-372-0052 (o), 312-520-0052 312-520-0052
(c) Patty Peterson, Sarah Bush Hospital: (217) 258-2420
(217) 258-2420 Tom Ciesielka, TC Public Relations: 312-422-1333
312-422-1333 Latherow Law Office

CONTACT: Jerry A. Latherow, attorney for plaintiffs, +1-312-372-0052
+1-312-372-0052 , cell, +1-312-520-0052
+1-312-520-0052 ; or Patty Peterson of Sarah Bush Hospital,
+1-217-258-2420 +1-217-258-2420 ; or Tom Ciesielka of
TC Public Relations, +1-312-422-1333 +1-312-422-1333 ,
tc@tcpr.net, for Latherow Law Office

Web site: http://www.latherowlaw.com/


D. P., Jr. should be 6 or 7 years old today.




Ontario boy dies after complications from circumcision Mark Brennae, CanWest
News Service
Published: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 Article tools

OTTAWA – A one-week-old Ontario infant died from complications after
undergoing a circumcision in a provincial hospital.

Information about the case was published in the April edition of Paediatric
Child Health.

The baby, whose name has been withheld by the parents, passed away after his
kidneys became enlarged to seven times their normal size.

The child was born at an unidentified Ontario hospital “sometime in the last
three years,” said Dr. Jim Cairns, Ontario´s deputy chief coroner. “The
family wants to keep this anonymous.”

No charges were ever laid and no legal action was ever taken in the case.

According to the Paediatric Child Health article, the boy was “bottlefed and
was reported to be doing well when he was circumsized.”

Five hours later, the parents returned to their family doctor with the
infant, who had become “irritable and had blue discolouration” below the
belly button.

Doctors noticed the discolouration and slight swelling of the penis, but sent
the child home.

Fourteen hours after the circumcision, according to Cairns, the child was
brought to another hospital where doctors noted he was extremely irritable
with marked swelling of the penis and bruising to the scrotum.

The child was then transferred to a paediatric centre, where his bladder was
diagnosed, Cairns said, to “seven or eight times its normal size.”

The PlastiBell ring, which is used to hold back the foreskin after
circumcision, was removed and drained and the child went into shock.

“If the PlastiBell had been taken off five hours after he got there, he would
be alive,” said Cairns.

The child´s death was attributed to septic shock – “an overwhelming
infection, leading to multi-organ failure,” Cairns said.

“Death is rare after circumcision,” said Cairns. “But complications can

The case was brought to Cairns´ attention because the circumstances of every
death of an Ontario child under five years of age must be reviewed by the
provincial coroner´s office.

© CanWest News Service 2007

Here’s another article that will link you to the Coroner’s report and
also contains a nice response from lawyer David Llewellyn:

Circumcision – a deadly reminder?
by Avis Favaro on Tue 22 May 2007 01:03 PM EDT | Permanent Link | Cosmos

Tucked inside the April edition of the Canadian Pediatric Child Health Journal is a tragic story. It’s never been reported in the lay media because the family at the centre has declined all interviews. But it needs to be relayed to doctors and families. It’s the story of a baby boy who died because he was circumcised.

Here is a summary of the case (.pdf)

Ontario ’s chief coroner, Jim Cairns, details how the child, 7 days old, was brought to a doctor for a circumcision in 2006. The doctor used a PlastiBell ring. Local anaesthetic was not used.

Five hours later, the parents returned to their family doctor because the baby was cranky and had blue discolouration below the umbilical cord when he cried. The doctor noticed that the penis was slightly swollen. The child was seen in hospital shortly after by a paediatrician who discharged him.

The baby was then brought to a different hospital 14 hours after the circumcision. He now had serious swelling and bruising around the penis and scrotum. He was running a temperature and was tested and found to be infected with E. coli. (Escherichia coli – a species of bacterium normally present in intestinal tract of humans and other animals; sometimes pathogenic; can be a threat to food safety)

Despite being given antibiotics, the baby went into septic shock and went on to develop multi-organ failure. He died seven days after his circumcision from hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (a deficiency of oxygen to the brain).

Dr. Cairns writes that in canvassing colleagues, he found a number of complications following circumcision in Canada , including:

– two children with necrosis or death of tissue in the penis
– two infants requiring transfusions
– one baby with a buried penis following to a circumcision
– a number of infants with complications related to the use of devices to perform the circumcisions.

Yet none of these complications were reported in the medical literature and so are not publicly available for study or for review.

I can’t think of anything more devastating for a parent than to have a child injured, or in this case, killed by an elective procedure. Are these risks being properly conveyed to parents before a circumcision is performed? Do doctors even have accurate data on the problems that can arise following a circumcision?

Perhaps this is why Dr. Cairns calls on a surveillance study by the Canadian Paediatric Society to get statistics of the actual complication rate of circumcision, to get a clearer picture on whether an elective procedure has more risks than doctors suspected.

Re: Circumcision – a deadly reminder?
by Dave2ga on Tue 12 Jun 2007 11:17 AM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
Dr. Cairns is to be commended for calling for a real survey of the very real dangers of circumcision. For too long circumcisers have hidden behind the false premise that circumcision has little risk. I expect that if this survey is properly done the public will be shocked at how often circumcisions go awry. As a lawyer I have dealt with several cases of damage to the glans and penile shaft denudation. It appears to me that these injuries are far more common than the public is led to believe. Even if they are relatively uncommon, each such injury is devastating to the boy who suffers it. Most suffer in silence or ignorance their whole lives. Is an elective procedure with dubious benefits really worth risking your son’s lifelong happiness? Parents need to answer that question before they consent to risking their child’s life or penis to make him “look like Dad.” Doctors should be ashamed of themselves for performing unnecessary,risky surgery on babies for profit. Indeed all of society should be ashamed for allowing such abuse to continue to occur, particulary since all of the alleged “benefits” of circumcision can be obtained by being faithful to one’s spouse and following simple rules of basic hygiene.

David J. Llewellyn
Attorney at Law
Atlanta, Georgia, USA


March 31, 2009

$2.3M awarded in suit over botched circumcision

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Monday, March 30, 2009

A Fulton County jury has awarded $1.8 million in damages to a boy whose penis was severed in a botched circumcision.

The state court jury gave another $500,000 to the boy´s mother in the
decision rendered Friday.

The case involves a child, identified only as D.P. Jr., who was born at
South Fulton Medical Center in 2004. In a suit filed two years later,
his mother contended that the doctor who circumcised him removed too
much tissue and that his pediatrician failed to respond when a nurse
complained of excessive bleeding.

The tip of the penis was placed in a biohazard bag and might have been
reattached if a urologist had attended to the boy within eight hours,
one of the mother´s lawyers, David J. Llewellyn of Atlanta, said.

The jury found that both the pediatrician, Dr. Cheryl Kendall, and the
physician who performed the circumcision, Dr. Haiba Sonyika, were
negligent. South Fulton Medical Center was absolved of liability.

The pediatrician´s lawyer, Roger Harris, said he disagreed that the
jury´s decision indicated that Dr. Kendall was negligent because she
didn´t go to the hospital. He hinted at an appeal. “We believe there
was error committed during the course of the trial,” he said.

Dr. Sonyika´s lawyer could not be reached for comment.

Llewellyn said the money awarded by the jury is to cover the cost of
medical treatments and psychiatric counseling for the boy and his
family. The jury did not award punitive damages. The Atlanta
Journal-Constitution is not naming the mother to avoid identifying the

“This case does point out one of the dangers of circumcision that every
parent must seriously consider when having the procedure done,”
Llewellyn said. He contended that parents are not told of the risks of
the procedure.


L.G. should be 3 or 4 years old today. The company that manufactured
the Mogen clamp has gone out of business and has defaulted on lawsuits
brought against them. How many Mogen clamps are still in use today,
with the potential for more botched circumcisions in the future from
use of this dangerous product? Why hasn´t the Mogen clamp been


Monday, July 19, 2010

By Ty Tagami

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution

The maker of an instrument used in circumcisions claimed that injury
was impossible with its use, but after an infant lost a portion of his
penis during an operation with the Mogen clamp, a judge awarded $10.8
million in damages against the company.

The judgment handed down Friday in New York involves an Atlanta lawyer
who has been crusading against circumcision as a dangerous and
unnecessary practice.

Attorney David Llewellyn won a similar case in Atlanta last year and
the injury behind that prior lawsuit in Fulton County Superior Court
put the New York clamp manufacturer on notice about the danger of the
device, his current lawsuit said.

The baby in the current case, identified in court documents only as
L.G., lost the entire glans, or head, of his penis after it was pulled
into the jaws of the clamp, according to a federal magistrate’s order.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered Mogen
Circumcision Instruments of New York to pay $10.8 million in
compensatory and punitive damages to the Florida boy, now 3, and his

The parents “are extraordinarily distraught and angered that this
company tells people it can’t happen,” Llewellyn said.

It’s unclear whether they will ever collect the money. Mogen is already
in default on a $7.5 million judgment in 2007 from a Massachusetts
lawsuit, Llewellyn said.

The company is going out of business, according to a woman who answered
the phone at its Brooklyn headquarters Monday. The woman, who said she was a secretary and would identify herself only as D. Rotter, the
person whom Llewellyn said was served papers in the lawsuit. She said
increased competition has undermined their business.

“It’s just kind of dwindling down to nothing,” she said, adding that
the phones at the Mogen office were scheduled to be disconnected
Tuesday. Mogen didn’t defend itself in court, and Rotter said it was
because the company couldn’t afford it.

She said the Mogen clamp is “painless and safe” when used properly. The case involving the Florida boy was “unfortunate,” she said, adding that “any medical mishap is unfortunate.”

In this case, a New York mohel, or Jewish ritual circumcisor, performed
the operation in the baby’s home, Llewellyn said. The mohel negotiated
a separate settlement, the terms of which Llewellyn would not disclose.

Llewellyn won another circumcision case in 2009 over an operation at
South Fulton Medical Center. In that case, which involved a baby
identified only as D.P. Jr., the mother contended that the doctor who
circumcised him removed too much tissue and that his pediatrician
failed to respond when a nurse complained of excessive bleeding.

The tip of the penis was placed in a biohazard bag and might have been
reattached if he’d gotten attention in time, Llewellyn said in 2009.
His lawsuit in New York says D.P. Jr. lost a third of his glans.

The jury found that both the pediatrician and the physician who
performed the circumcision were negligent, and awarded $2.3 million to
the plaintiffs. South Fulton Medical Center was absolved of liability.

In Friday’s decision, the court determined that Mogen had to pay for
medical expenses and for the years of psychotherapy that will be
needed. The boy suffers pain when he urinates, the court order says. He will eventually be able to have sex, but he is likely to be embarrassed and will likely have trouble forming “meaningful” relationships with girls, it adds. “At 3 years old, L.G. is aware that he looks different from other boys based on both his own observations and comments from other children which make him feel inferior .”


July 15, 2010 New York Dangerous Product Lawsuit gets $10.8 Million
Award Posted By Advance My Lawsuit

In New York, a lawsuit was filed against the maker of a medical
instrument, known as the Mogen clamp, which is used during
circumcisions. In the lawsuit, it is alleged that the instrument
caused an infant to lose a portion of his genitalia during a routine
circumcision. Recently, a judge awarded the infant’s family $10.8
million in damages against the company.

The attorney representing the plaintiffs, David Llewellyn, has handled
and won similar cases in the recent past. Last year, he won a
circumcision case in Fulton Superior Court after he was able to prove
that the New York clamp manufacturer’s product presented dangers.

In the most recent case, U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein ordered
Mogen Circumcision Instruments of New York to pay the plaintiffs $10.8
million in punitive and compensatory damages. The boy who was injured is now three years of age.

Llewellyn told news sources that the parents, “are extraordinarily
distraught and angered that this company tells people it can’t happen”.

It has been revealed that Mogen is already in default on a $7.5 million
judgment from 2007 that was ordered in the state of Massachusetts and is going out of business.


Daniel Burden should be 3 years old today.


Lawsuit claims botched circumcision
April 15, 2009 7:28 AM |

A Northwestern Memorial Hospital obstetrician is being sued for
allegedly botching a circumcision of a 1-day-old baby and cutting off a
portion of the infant’s penis, according to WBBM-AM 780.

The suit, filed Tuesday in Cook County Circuit Court by David Burden on
behalf of his son Daniel Burden, claims that on Oct. 5, 2007, one day
after Daniel was born, Dr. Marc Feldstein performed a circumcision on
the boy. However, rather than removing only the foreskin, the doctor
cut and removed a portion of the baby’s penis, the suit said.

After the procedure, baby Daniel was transferred to Children’s Memorial
Hospital to have emergency corrective surgery.

Burden accuses Dr. Feldstein, Northwestern Women’s Health Associates and Northwestern Memorial Hospital of medical negligence. The suit asks for more than $50,000.


If Bradley Dorcius were still alive, he´d be 2 years old today.


Saturday, October 3, 2009

BROOKLYN (WABC) — Shock and sorrow for a mother and father in
Brooklyn. They took their infant son to the hospital for what they
thought was routine surgery.Now, they’re planning his funeral.

Seven-month-old Bradley Dorcius died two days after having an operation to correct his urine flow and a circumcision.

In the recovery room at SUNY Downstate Hospital, his mother says
Bradley began bleeding from his mouth and nose, and later died.

His parents are devastated and they’re demanding answers.

The hospital spokesperson calls Bradley’s death a sad incident and says the hospital is investigating. His parents say he had no allergies and no other known medical conditions.



Law Offices of Daniel Malis, P.C. 30 Second Street
Cambridge, MA 02141-1734
Telephone: 617 491 1099 FAX: 617 491 1022

Settlement Update: $1 million+ For Victim of Botched Circumcision – The
Case of the Suspended Surgeon

December 28th, 2009

Our office has obtained a settlement of over $1 million in present and
future payouts for scarring caused by a negligent surgeon who botched a child´s circumcision and then attempted to conceal his error.

The case involved a relatively inexperienced family practitioner who,
during an otherwise routine circumcision of an infant, removed almost
all of the skin covering the shaft of the child´s member. The
physician had apparently become confused and disoriented during the
procedure and improperly re-adjusted a clamp which would have prevented this drastic mistake. He stopped bleeding by extensively using a chemical agent to cauterize the bleeding and traumatized skin, and covered the wound with an over-large bandage. He also reassured the child´s parents, who were concerned about their child´s appearance,
that the seeping wound was `normal´ and would be `fine´ in a later
visit. The `overly aggressive´ circumcision was discovered by a
supervising physician from the physician´s practice on the day after
the circumcision, and the child was rushed to a consultation with a
pediatric urologist, who eventually repaired the damage with a skin
graft. The doctor later apologized to the child´s parents.

The defendant physician´s counsel insisted that the error in practice
was not malpractice, but an `unfortunate result´, despite the
physician´s subsequent termination from the family practice which hired
him based upon the incident, as well as critical comments made by the
head of the physician´s practice and the doctor who discovered his
malpractice. The insurer maintained this position virtually up to the
time of trial, despite evidence which showed that the physician´s
description of the manner in which the clamp was used was hopelessly
confused and incorrect at deposition, and his attempt to distance
himself from his apology to the child´s parents by claiming that it was
not motivated by guilt but by a desire to avoid a malpractice suit.
Further evidence that the physician had appeared to become distracted
while making comments to nursing students observing the procedure
provided more proof of the physician´s failure to use due care.

The physician´s attorney also (correctly) argued that the scarring
caused by the malpractice had been corrected within six months of the
procedure and that the child had no observable medical problems and
preserved function. The physician´s insurer claimed that damages were
therefore minimal. We countered this argument with extensive medical
research and psychiatric expert opinion concerning the likely
psychological effects on child and mother caused by such a
disfigurement. The case went to mediation one week before trial, and
was successfullly settled for a structured payout worth $350,000
present value, with a stream of payments worth in excess of $1 million
over the life of the child.


Mario Viera, the boy circumcised without his parent´s consent or his
consent, should be 9 months old today.


Saturday, September 18, 2010

Wrongful Circumcision of Baby Mario: Court Documents COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, VERA DELGADO, as parent and natural guardian of MARIO VIERA,
a minor,
by and through undersigned counsel, sue the Defendants, MARY JEAN
PAZOS, M.D. and SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, and would allege as follows:

1. This is an action for personal injury damages, with damages in
excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Honorable Court,
to-wit: Fifteen Thousand and no/IOO ($15,000.00) Dollars, exclusive of
costs and interest.

2. At all times material to hereto, the Plaintiff, VERA DELGADO, was
and is a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida, and is the parent and
natural guardian of Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, a minor, is otherwise sui

3. Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, is the minor child of Plaintiff, VERA
DELGADO, and is a resident of Miami-Dade County, Florida.

4. At all times material hereto, Defendant, MARY JEAN PAZOS, M.D.,
individually and/or as an agent, apparent agent or employee of herself,
was and is a licensed medical doctor under the laws of the State of
Florida, authorized to provide health care services to individuals such
as the Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, a minor, in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

5. At all time material hereto, Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, Inc.,
was and is a licensed hospital under the laws of the State of Florida,
authorized to provide health caie services to individuals such as
Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, a minor, in Miami-Dade County, Florida

6. At all times material to this Complaint, the Defendants had the
responsibility to provide
medical care and treatment of the Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, a minor.

7. On or about July 24, 2010 Plaintiff, VERA DELGADO, gave birth to
MARIO VIERA, a minor, at SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC. and admitted into
its Neonatal Intensive Care Unit due to birth related complications.

8. Plaintiff, VERA DELGADO, as parent and natural guardian of MARIO
VIERA, a minor, repeatedly informed Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL,
INC., its staff and agents that she did not want or authorize the
Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, a minor, to be circumcised.

9. On or about August 2, 2010, while Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, a minor,
was still under the care of Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC.’S,
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Defendants, MARY JEAN PAZOS, M.D., nurses
and agents of Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC., and without
consent performed an unauthorized amputation of the foreskin of his


Plaintiff adopts and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 9 as though fully
set forth herein.

10. On or about August 2, 2010, at the hospital operated by Defendant,
force and against the consent of Plaintiff, VERA DELGADO, as parent and
natural guardian of MARIO VIERA, a minor, performed an unauthorized
amputation of the foreskin of his penis.

11. The unauthorized amputation of the foreskin of his penis was
committed by the Defendant, MARY JEAN PAZOS, M.D., while she performed
the medical procedure on the Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, A MINOR, in
furtherance of her duties as an employee, servant, staff member and/or
agent of the Defendant soum MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC.

12. As a result of these wrongful and malicious acts of Defendant, MARY
JEAN PAZOS, M.D., Plaintiff, VERA DELGADO, as parent and natural
guardian of MARIO VIERA, a minor, has suffered greatly in mind and body
and will continue to suffer damages.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, VERA DELGADO, as parent and natural guardian of
MARIO VIERA, a minor, demands judgment for damages against the
Defendant, MARY JEAN PAZOS, M.D., and such other and further relief as
this Court deems just and proper.


Plaintiff adopts and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 12 as though fully set forth herein.

13. On or about August 2, 2010, the Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC.,
operated a hospital providing Neonatal care in Miami-Dade County, Florida.

14. On that date, Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, A MINOR, was a patient at the
hospital and therefore on the premises lawfully.

15. At all times relevant the Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC.,
owed a duty to protect the Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, A MINOR, and is
responsible for any and all injuries sustained on its premises to
patients in its care.

16. At all times material hereto, the Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL,
INC., breached its duty by failing to warn Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, A
MINOR, or by allowing a dangerous condition on the premises, to-wit,
their employee and/or agent Defendant, MARY JEAN PAZOS, M.D., to
perform an unauthorized surgical procedure without consent on

17. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI
HOSPITAL, INC.’S, negligence, Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, A MINOR, suffered
bodily injury that is permanent within a reasonable degree of medical
probability and resulting pain and suffering, disability,
disfigurement, mental anguish, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of
life, expense of hospitalization, medical and nursing care and
treatment. The losses are either permanent or continuing and Plaintiff
will suffer the losses in the future.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, VERA DELGADO, as parent and natural guardian of MARIO
VIERA, a minor, demands judgment for damages against the Defendants
HOSPITAL, INC., and for such other and further relief as this Court
deems just and proper.


Plaintiff adopts and realleges the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 17 as though fully set forth herein.

18. At all times relevant hereto the Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL,
INC., did employ agents, employees, officers, staff, administrators,
representatives, servants and maintenance personnel, and said
Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC., exercised jurisdiction and
control over the procedures which said agents, employees, officers,
staff administrators, representatives, servants and maintenance
personal had the privilege to perform. Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL,
INC., determined the qualifications and lack of qualifications of said
personnel relating to those duties which were devised by said
Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC., for the agents, employees,
officers, staff, administrators, representatives, servants and
maintenance personnel.

19. At all times relevant, the Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC.,
negligently hired, trained, supervised and/or retained its employee,
servant, staff member or agent, who at the time of the incident herein
were on staff to provide medical care and assistance to Plaintiff,

20. That the Defendant, MARY JEAN PAZOS, M.D, with the assistance of
employees and agents of Defendant South MH performed an unauthorized
surgical procedure on Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, A MINOR, to wit: the
amputation of the foreskin of his penis.

21. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant, SOUTH MIAMI
negligence, Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, A MINOR, suffered bodily injury
that is permanent within a reasonable degree of medical probability and
resulting pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, mental
anguish, loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, expense of
hospitalization, medical and nursing care and treatment. The losses are
either permanent or continuing and Plaintiff will suffer the losses in
the future.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, MARIO VIERA, A MINOR, demands judgment for
damages against the Defendant SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL, INC., and for such
other and further relief as this court deems just and proper.

DATED: this 13th day of September 2010.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
3132 Ponce de Leon Boulevard
Coral Gables, Florida 33134
Telephone: (305) 441-0440 (305) 441-0440 Facsimile:
(305) 441-0198

Spencer Marc Aronfeld, Esq.
Fla. Bar No.: 0905161


If Joshua Haskins were alive today, he´d be 8 months old.

Joshua Haskins died on October 6, 2010 in Indianapolis, Indiana. Born
on August 16, 2010 with a congenital heart defect, Joshua was
circumcised in the NICU on October 5, 2010 around 1:00 pm. The
circumcising doctor nicked an artery, and Joshua bled until 7:30 pm,
when a urologist stopped the bleeding with stitches. Joshua died the
following morning at 8:58 am.



See this site to read copies of the blog posts the mother wrote, and
has since removed.



Jameson should be 3 months old today.


January 16, 2011- “One of my very close friends just had a baby boy,
Jameson. It has been sad all around because he was diagnosed with
hemophilia at birth just like his 2 year old brother Jackie (my friend)
is understandably upset that she gave birth to another special needs
child. But Jameson is having major complications from his circumcision
and he may lose his penis. He is in surgery right now. Please pray for
their family. My heart is broken for them.”

“UPDATE: He is still not doing well. They still don’t know what will
happen to his penis. It was really affected but they have to wait and
see. His brother Jackson was circumcised with no problems but Jameson
didn’t take to the factor I guess.”

One mother asked if the doctors knew the baby had hemophilia before
circumcising him. “They knew before so I’m not sure why they had him

Other mothers offered prayers, comments, and questions.

“I cannot believe the Dr.’s would go ahead with unnecessary surgery.”

“Why on earth would they circumcise a hemophiliac child?”

“I don’t think circumcision is necessary to begin with, just awful they
would even consider it & risk his life over it is beyond me.”

This boy will turn 3 in July 2011.


LR hospital botched surgery, suit says

By John Lynch
An Arkansas Children´s Hospital surgeon mutilated their infant son in a
botched circumcision, a Jonesboro couple says in a malpractice lawsuit
against the hospital, doctor and nurses, claiming the error left the
boy – described as a “cripple” – with a disfigured “fragment.”

The complete article about this hospital in Little Rock being sued can
be found at:


It´s not clear how old Lantz is today.


Friday, March 25, 2011
Circumcision Gone Wrong: Lantz’ Story By Brooke [last name withheld at
author’s request] © 2011

As soon as I found out I was having a boy I started researching
circumcision. I did not like what I saw. So much pain for such a little
person to deal with for what I found to be no apparent reason. I had
totally made up my mind and I was completely against such a barbaric
elective surgery.

But as soon as people find out you’re having a boy it starts… the
questioning. “Your gonna get him cut right?” “Are you circumcising?”
“Who’s doing his circumcision?” I always answered with, “I won’t be
getting him circumcised.” Then came the “Ohhhh…” with an eyeroll. I
let it go…

His father was all for circumcision, but I put up such a huge fight
that he finally just let me have my way. My dad wanted him to be
circumcised as well, but I just ignored him the best I could. At the
time of Lantz’s birth there was quite a lot going on in my life. My
grandmother was dying of brain cancer and she passed five days after
Lantz was born. I was extremely close to her – she was like a second
mother to me. She was home on hospice in the end, and we took care of
her 24/7. So I was beyond stressed at this time.

It was at this point in Lantz’s young life that someone said something
to me that would ultimately cause me to circumcise my baby. Their words
hurt so bad, that it made me do it. I don’t want to discuss
specifically what was said, or who said it, but just know that it still
hurts me today.

After my Grandmother passed, we had to travel for her funeral, and
while we were out of town I decided I couldn’t risk my son hating me in
the long run, so I planned to have him circumcised when I got home. I
called and made the appointment, and my aunt and I took him to be

We arrived around 11am and waited for a few minutes until the nurse
called us back. She took Lantz from me and told me to go back to the
waiting room – she would be back in about twenty minutes. So we sat
down and waited. Only minutes later she came out again and called us
back. There were two big double doors to get to the back of the office
where the rooms for circumcision surgery were. As soon as she opened
one of the doors I could hear Lantz screaming. I was in shock.

She led us into the room and I almost hit the floor. There lied my
beautiful, perfect baby strapped to a board screaming so very hard he
was purple and couldn’t catch his breath. His hands were so tight his
knuckles were white. I rubbed the only place I could, his forehead. I
stroked it and told him I loved him and that he would be okay. The
nurse just kept saying over and over again, “He’s going be fine.” She
made me feel like what I was doing was wrong – as though I shouldn’t be
attempting to console my baby.

The doctor was in the room but he didn’t say anything to me – he just
left the room. The nurse then told me that she couldn’t get the
bleeding to stop. She asked my aunt to hold pressure while she left the
room to get a Styrofoam band to wrap around his penis to try and stop
the bleeding. After she applied the band she put his diaper back on and once again told us he was fine, and that we could leave to go home, so we did.

We drove the forty-five minute drive back to our house. When we arrived
into town I stopped by my mom’s office where she worked as a nurse to
tell her about what had just happened. She told us to go on home and
she followed to take a look at Lantz. When she took his diaper off, it
was completely and totally full of blood. She looked at me and said,
“We’re going back now.”

I called to let them know we were on our way, and off we went back to
the doctors office. They took us back where they held pressure for what
seemed like forever! A doctor came in and looked at Lantz and left the
room without saying anything to us. Another doctor came in and did the
same. Finally, the first doctor came back and told me they nicked a
vein and she was getting a surgeon to come over and cauterize the vein.
So there we sat with my bleeding, screaming baby and waited for the
surgeon who never came.

After waiting for a very long time my mom went into the hall to ask
someone where the surgeon was. They sent us across the street directly
to another surgeon´s office. He called us back, took off Lantz’s diaper
and said, “Oh no – they’ve cut all the skin off.” He sent us to the
emergency department at the hospital where they performed an emergency
surgery to stitch the top of Lantz’s penis to the baby fat around the
base to stop the bleeding. The doctor had cut all the skin off the
shaft of Lantz´s penis. He bled for eight hours.

When Lantz was eighteen months old he had his second corrective
surgery. We waited in a room with Lantz, where they had us dress him in a tiny hospital gown and gave him toys to play with while we waited. And then they came to get us. My mom and I walked Lantz down a long white hallway following the doctor. We came to a set of big swinging doors and the doctor turned to us and said this is our stop. So I kissed Lantz, told him I loved him, and handed him over to a complete stranger. I turned around and walked away, holding onto my mom all the way back down the hallway, sobbing. We waited in a huge waiting room with lots of other people waiting for family who were in surgery also.
It seemed like years, and then finally they called for “the mother of
Lantz.” As soon as I saw him, I just wanted to hold on to him forever
and never let him go. There he was – drugged and limp, in his tiny
hospital gown. They put him in my arms and wheeled us to recovery. He was pitiful. But I thought to myself, “It is over! Thank God! We did
it! He’s fixed!”

When Lantz was two years old we had another appointment with his
pediatric urologist who informed us he would indeed need yet another
corrective surgery. One week later, there we were in the same boat we
had already been in. Only difference this time was that when they came
out post-op to call for “the mother of Lantz,” I went back to my
uncontrollable, screaming son. I could do nothing to help him. He just
cried, “Owie, owie…” It was horrible. The next few weeks were even
worse. Every time he walked he cried owie. His penis was so swollen I
thought it was going to pop. Then the night terrors started. He would
start screaming with his eyes still closed, and I could not wake him
up, and could not do anything to calm him. He just screamed and
screamed for months, every single night.

After this, we were finally told there would “most likely” be no more
surgery! Lantz will have problems in his future because of the
circumcision, but there is no way to know just how bad they will be,
and there is nothing we can do to fix them. The guilt I feel hurts so
bad. Why wasn’t I strong enough to stand up for my baby? How am I going
to explain this to him when he’s older? Nothing in my life has ever
hurt this bad. I scarred my baby – my sweet, perfect baby.

If Eric Dickson Keefe were still alive, he´d be nearly 3 years old today.


Circumcision Death Case Settles for $230,000
April 8th, 2011 by ICGI

Native American Boy Bleeds to Death

The lawsuit involving a South Dakota Native American infant, Eric
Dickson Keefe, from the Rosebud Indian Reservation, who bled to death
from a circumcision in 2008, was settled this week for $230,000. The case involved an Indian Health Service doctor who circumcised the child at the end of the working day allowing for no period of post-surgical observation. Testimony showed the mother faced a long drive home on rural roads with other children in her care.

“This was sheer negligence and an ethical failure to consider the
risk,” says George C. Denniston, MD, MPH, President of Doctors Opposing
Circumcision, a physicians´ group based in Seattle, Washington, which
assisted with the case. “Circumcision is unnecessary surgery, which the
parents are never told holds a risk of death for their child.”

Keefe bled to death during the night from his open circumcision wound
in June, 2008. Medical professionals say that the loss of only two and
one-half ounces of blood can cause the death of even a large
eight-pound infant. “That amount of blood, just a few drops per hour,
was easily hidden in the super-absorbent disposable diaper baby Keefe
was diapered with.” notes Denniston, “Parents are never told about that

Doctors Opposing Circumcision has provided expert advice for numerous
circumcision death cases. “Exsanguination, or bleeding to death, is
hard to detect,” says Denniston, “since the child slips away quietly,
and no one wants to disturb what appears to be a sleeping child.”

Death from circumcision is relatively rare, although a recent study
estimates that around 117 children in the United States die each year
from circumcision. “These are entirely avoidable deaths,” says
Denniston, “caused by a pointless surgery that the child would never
choose for himself.”

This is the obituary for Eric Keefe who was dearly loved by his family:

During the winter of 2007-08 there was a big secret in the Keefe household in Wood, SD, with only a few weeks to go news was out – a baby boy was on the way.

Eric Dickson Keefe was born May 1st, 2008 at the Rosebud Hospital. To help enter him into the world were his Uncle Donnie and Aunt Alicia. With great delight uncle Donnie embraced his new nephew. Eric being the third child of Mary Aurelia was received with great expectation and joy by sister, Sarah Serena, and brother, Garrett Arlen. No minute sibling rivalry was ever present – only deep sincere love and protection was evident in their hearts and minds.

Eric with his sister and brother

Besides Eric’s family at home there were quite a few others interested in his arrival; a host of relatives, all the friends and neighbors far and wide, and caring co-workers of mother. Eric was a special baby – right from the start!
Sarah was so thrilled that she was insistent that her, “Show-and-tell” for the 2nd grade class of the Wood School be her brother. Once brother, Eric, arrived at school Sarah issued a litany of jubilations that she had experienced on behalf of the little one. She also wanted all of the other children to get acquainted with the new blessing. They were very kind and sincerely greeted Eric.

Sarah wished to engender the many interests that she has into her new brother. Of course knowing Sarah… they are not the usual interests most little girls know – as hers interests include: turtles, frogs, snakes, gymnastics, fashion, astronomy, and a plethora of the gifts of nature. Sarah surely impressed Eric by reading stories to him that she personally wrote and illustrated.

Each and every morning Garrett would wake up and come running out insistent on seeing his “Cutiefrom Heaven”. Garrett was present when his mother had a CVS done. During this procedure Eric, at 11 weeks, waved his little hand to his brother. Garrett could see this on the monitor and was especially impressed. So much so that he indicated – See! He does know me! Garrett wanted to instill into his brother what it meant to be a “Great Leprechaun Hunter”, for Leprechauns are always searching for the gold at the end of the rainbow. (Imagination is a great thing – faith an even greater.)

Many great plans for the future were made for this little one – Disney World, hiking, camping, falconry, and saving dogs.

In the early hours of pre-dawn of June 14th, 2008 Eric’s mother rushed him to Indian Health Service in Rosebud, SD. And on the way the radio tuned in Louie Armstrong’s “Wonderful World”. Turning the volume up Mary Aurelia turned to her son, Eric, and said, “Listen to this, Eric, for this is what our lives have truly been, since you have been here .You punctuate who we are.” The rest of the ride was done so in virtual silence.

Grandfather KiKi called for Father Witt, S.J. come to baptize and to give the last rites to Eric. After which, his siblings came to his side to pray with him one last time. For six weeks Sarah and Garrett loved this blessed soul an entire lifetime. While Eric ascended his mother prayed the same prayer once again to the Blessed Virgin. Her prayers were answered. He has a plan. Sometimes we do not always get our prayers answered like we would like them…but they are answered.

Family friend and Roman Catholic Deacon Marlon Leneaugh gave a beautiful sermon at Eric’s funeral mass. His godmother, Jody Callaway, eulogized his continued life. Joyce Colombe offered a tender poem. Sharon Bryan inspired a choir of angles, while Kay Piper issued from the depths of her being the most beautiful sounds. On June 19, 2008 Donnie Boyd, Albert Joseph, Dr. Thomas Keefe, and Steve Peters helped to lay Eric to eternal rest the Evergreen Cemetery in Wood, SD.

Preceding Eric in his journey are L. Monica Dickson, Colonel Thomas Keefe, and Shari Tuthill. Blessed for sharing Eric’s life are Garrett Arlen, Sarah Serena, Mary Aurelia and Forrest Keefe, grandfather Willis E. (KiKi) Dickson, Sr., grandmother Lois Keefe, uncles George Dickson, David E. C. Dickson, Willis E. Dickson, Jr., and Dr. Thomas Keefe, aunts Laurie Dickson and Alicia Dickson-Boyd, and cousins Joyce Colombe.


Here´s an example of a mother practicing her own religious beliefs (and
presumably also what she perceived to be her parental rights) upon her
son, when she circumcised him herself.


Oregon woman ‘used box cutter and pliers to circumcise three-month-old
son at home… after learning how on YouTube’
By Paul Thompson
Last updated at 12:12 PM on 12th April 2011
A mother is to go on trial for assault after allegedly using a box
cutter and a pair of pliers to circumcise her three-month-old son.

Keemonta Peterson told police she had watched YouTube videos on how to
carry out the surgical procedure.

The mother-of-four is alleged to have left her baby son bleeding for
two hours before finally calling emergency services.

Peterson, 29, said she was inspired to carry out the DIY operation at
her home in Portland, Oregon, after reading the Bible.

According to an arrest report Peterson began the operation at midnight
using a box cutter knife as a scalpel and the pliers as a tourniquet.

When the bleeding would not stop on the botched operation she tried to
stitch up the wound while her distressed 13 year old son watched.

After two hours of `uncontrolled´ bleeding Peterson called paramedics.

Her son, who has not been named, was listed in critical condition but
has since made a full recovery following the October incident.

Following her arrest Peterson told detectives she decided on the DIY
circumcision as hospitals in Portland will not carry out the operation
of boys older than four weeks.

Peterson was arrested last month and charged with first and second
degree assault.

Her bail was set at $550,000 but following a hearing was reduced to
$5,000 and she was released from jail.

Prosecutors told the court Peterson had voiced her concerns about her
mental health and said she had suffered hallucinations that prevented
her from sleeping for days.

Her four children are being looked after by social workers and Peterson
is to go on trial in June.



Keith Halpern, Attorney at Law
572 Washington Street, suite 19
Wellesley, MA 02482

Botched Circumcision – $60,000 Award for Child

An Ob-Gyn removed too much skin in performing a circumcision. The
infant had to undergo two repair procedures.

March 2013 from Facebook


Hold that hat!


Someone on Facebook is doing a survey of what birth workers think about putting knit toques on newborn heads.

We have to ask ourselves about the way this hat thing got going. Babies were not doing well after being born to medicated women and immediate cord clamping. The baby who has started off at such a deficit will lose body heat and be in very rough shape. Helping keep in heat by a hat might be a matter of life and death in this instance where the body is so weakened.

Contrast that to a baby born spontaneously and placed on his mother’s body. . . both of them wrapped together in a warmed blanket skin to skin. The cord is intact, the placenta continues its work of transferring just the right amount of blood back and forth to the baby while he/she adjusts to life in an air environment in a leisurely fashion.

Then, the baby and the mother lock in a gaze; the mother recognizing that this is her own; she buries her nose in the wet head and drinks in the smell of her young; she locks the imprint of that child’s whole being into her vision and she would not ever confuse her baby with someone else’s. Later, she chooses the clothing SHE wants her child to wear; she dresses and grooms her own baby. . . she is in charge and has been born as the mother. No one and no article of clothing has come between her and her total impressions of that baby. Through skin, mouth, nose, eyes and heart she has claimed the baby as her own and the bond is strong.


Bringing medical birth practices to a natural birth is a sign that we lost so much knowledge in the dark years when homebirth/midwifery was wiped out. Now, we can look again at these things and lay them aside as foolish for well women and their infants.

Full Text of Circumcision Rate Falling News

This is the full text. Good news that the rate is in free fall, frightening and sickening that 6.5 million innocent American boys were mutilated between 2006 and 2009. Gloria

By Mitchel L. Zoler
Elsevier Global Medical News

Breaking News

VIENNA (EGMN) – Circumcision rates for newborn boys in the United States
dropped steadily and markedly over the past 4 years, based on the largest
review of U.S. rates ever done.

Circumcision rates fell from 56% in 2006 to 33% in 2009.

The review, which included more than 6.5 million U.S. newborn boys during
the period, also showed that adverse event rates following newborn male
circumcision were “extremely low,” and that the most common adverse events
were “mild and easily corrected,” Charbel El Bcheraoui, Ph.D., said at the
18th International AIDS Conference.

“Severe male circumcision-related adverse events are extremely rare,” said
Dr. El Bcheraoui, an epidemic intelligence service officer in the division
of HIV/AIDS prevention at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The dramatic decline in circumcision rates during 2006-2009 continued a
trend that began in the United States earlier in the decade, although the
fall appeared to accelerate recently, he said. He attributed the drop to a
1999 statement by the American Academy of Pediatrics that said existing data
were not sufficient to recommend routine newborn male circumcision
(Pediatrics 1999;103:686-93).

Another factor may be that following the AAP statement, several states
withdrew Medicaid coverage of newborn male circumcision, Dr. El Bcheraoui
said. An earlier report by him and his CDC associates documented that during
1979-2006, the U.S. newborn male circumcision rate was relatively stable,
with an average rate of 61%.

The recent fall in U.S. circumcision rates coincided with reports from three
African-based randomized controlled trials in 2005-2007 that showed
circumcised men had a 50%-70% reduced risk for acquiring HIV infection,
compared with uncircumcised men. These findings led the World Health
Organization and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS to recommend
male circumcision as an important intervention to reduce the risk for
heterosexually acquired HIV infection in 2007. The CDC and AAP are now
independently interpreting the application of these recent findings on HIV
transmission to the United States based on U.S. prevalence rates of HIV and
circumcision, he said.

The new study also analyzed 90-day outcome data on 258,189 boys and men aged
1 or older who underwent circumcision during 2006-2009, and found that
adverse events occurred much more frequently in this age group, “an
important new finding,” Dr. El Bcheraoui said.

His study used data from the largest U.S. consolidator of electronic health
care reimbursement claims, which included data on 117 million unique U.S.
patients annually undergoing short hospital stays, and data from more than
800,000 unique U.S. health care providers. In this database, 6,571,500
newborn boys underwent circumcision during 2006-2009. To estimate the
incidence of circumcision-associated adverse events, the researchers tallied
the rate of any of 41 different ICD-9 and CPT codes that could be such
events during the 90 days following circumcision. They also compared these
rates in 18,330 infants circumcised within the first month of life with a
matched set of uncircumcised infants.

The data showed that the rates for a range of adverse events, such as
mishaps, correctional procedures, and infections were substantially lower in
boys less than 1 year old, compared with boys aged 1-9 years, and with boys
and men aged 10 years or older. For example, mishaps occurred in none of the
boys aged less than 1 year or aged 1-9 years, but in 158/100,000 boys and
men aged 10 years or older. The rate of correctional procedures was
58/100,000; 2,544/100,000; and 1,709/100,000 in the three age groups,
respectively. Infections occurred at a rate of 154/100,000; 5,664/100,000;
and 4,527/100,000 in the three age groups.

The case-control analysis identified only two types of adverse events that
were more common in circumcised newborn boys, compared with matched
uncircumcised infants: repair for incomplete circumcision, and lysis or
excision of penile adhesions. All other adverse events tallied either
similar rates among the cases and controls, or were significantly more
common among the controls.

“This is the largest study to examine the incidence of male circumcision
adverse events to date. It is highly representative [for the United States],
with a large data set” and with a large number of potential adverse events
tracked, Dr. El Bcheraoui said. One of the strengths of the study was its
longitudinal design, which followed subjects for 90 days following

Dr. El Bcheraoui and his associates said they had no disclosures.